Methods of treating patients suffering from movement disorders

ABSTRACT

Methods of treating movement disorders by administering an effective amount of one or more adenosine A 2A  receptor antagonists to a patient in need thereof and methods of decreasing the adverse effects of L-DOPA in patients receiving L-DOPA therapy in the treatment of Parkinson&#39;s disease. Also, methods and compositions for treating Parkinson&#39;s disease patients with sub-clinically effective doses of L-DOPA with an effective amount of one or more adenosine A 2A  receptor antagonists, optionally with a dopamine agonist and/or a COMT inhibitor and/or a MAO inhibitor.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/353,240 filed Jan. 28, 2003, which in turn claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/352,413 filed Jan. 28, 2002.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to methods of treating patients suffering from movement disorders comprising administering at least one adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Movement Disorders are neurological conditions characterized by either a paucity or lack of movement (such as Parkinson disease) or excessive movement (such as dystonia, dyskinesia, tremor, chorea, ballism, akathisia, athetosis, bradykinesia, freezing, rigidity, postural instability, myoclonus, and tics or Tourette syndrome). See, Watts and William eds. (1997); and Shulman and Weiner (1997).

Parkinson's Disease and Motor Complication

Parkinson's disease (paralysis agitans) is a disorder of the brain characterized by shaking and difficulty with walking, movement, and coordination. The disease is associated with damage to a part of the brain that controls muscle movement.

Parkinson's disease was first described in England in 1817 by James Parkinson. The disease affects approximately 2 out of 1,000 people, and most often develops after age 50. The symptoms first appear, on average, at about age 60, and the severity of Parkinson's symptoms tends to worsen over time. It affects both men and women and is one of the most common neurologic disorders of the elderly. The term “parkinsonism” refers to any condition that involves a combination of the types of changes in movement seen in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism may be genetic, or caused by other disorders or by external factors (secondary parkinsonism).

In the United States, about a million people are believed to suffer from Parkinson's disease, and about 50,000 new cases are reported every year. Because the symptoms typically appear later in life, these figures are expected to grow as the average age of the population increases over the next several decades. The disorder is most frequent among people in their 70s and 80s, and appears to be slightly more common in men than in women.

The dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra pars compacta and ventral tegmental area play a crucial role in regulating movement and cognition, respectively.

Several lines of evidence suggest that the degeneration of dopaminergic cells (i.e. dopamine-producing cells) in the substantia nigra produces the symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Dopaminergic cells, concentrated in the region of the substantia nigra, are the fastest aging cells in the body. As dopaminergic cells decay, control over movement is diminished and Parkinson's disease develops. Usually the first symptom of Parkinson's disease is tremor (trembling or shaking) of a limb, especially when the body is at rest. The tremor often begins on one side of the body, frequently in one hand. Other common symptoms include other movement disorders such as slow movement (bradykinesia), an inability to move (akinesia), rigid limbs, a shuffling gait, and a stooped posture. Parkinson's disease patients often show reduced facial expression and speak in a soft voice. The disease can cause secondary symptoms of depression, anxiety, personality changes, cognitive impairment, dementia, sleep disturbances, speech impairments or sexual difficulties. There is no known cure for Parkinson's disease. Treatment is aimed at controlling the symptoms. Medications control symptoms primarily by controlling the imbalance between the neurotransmitters. Most early Parkinson's disease patients respond well to symptomatic treatment with dopamine replacement therapy, but disability increases with progression of the disease.

The medications used, the dose and the amount of time between doses vary, depending on the case. The combination of medications used may need to be adjusted as symptoms change. Many of the medications can cause severe side effects, so monitoring and follow-up by the health care provider is important.

Although currently available medications for Parkinson's disease generally provide adequate symptomatic control for a number of years, many patients develop motor fluctuations and dyskinesias that compromise clinical response. Rascol et al. (2000); and Parkinson Study Group (2000). Once this occurs, increasing dopaminergic therapy is likely to worsen dyskinesias and decreasing dopaminergic therapy is likely to worsen motor function and increase OFF time. In light of this problem, attention has turned to potential therapeutic manipulation of non-dopaminergic neurotransmitter systems.

Most Parkinson's disease symptoms arise from a deficiency of dopamine and most anti-Parkinson drugs restore dopamine or mimic dopamine's actions. However, the drugs do not permanently restore dopamine or exactly mimic dopamine's actions. While a loss of dopamine cells in the substantia nigra is the main feature of Parkinson's disease, non-dopamine nerve cells are also lost. Moreover, dopamine-responsive cells are present not only in the substantia nigra but in other brain regions. Thus drugs that are effective in Parkinson's disease can, by stimulating these cells, cause side effects such as nausea, hallucinations, and confusion.

In 1967, L-DOPA was introduced and remains the most effective anti-Parkinson drug. Symptoms most likely to benefit from L-DOPA include bradykinesia, rigidity, resting tremor, difficulty walking, and micrographia. Symptoms least likely to benefit from L-DOPA include postural instability, action tremor, and difficulty swallowing. L-DOPA may worsen dementia. Although L-DOPA provides robust and rapid therapeutic benefits in Parkinson's disease, eventually, severe adverse reactions to dopamine emerge, including motor complications such as wearing off phenomenon, ON-OFF fluctuations, and dyskinesia. Marsden et al. (1982). Once established, motor complications are not typically controllable with manipulation of L-DOPA or other dopaminergic drugs.

Early in Parkinson's disease L-DOPA is taken 3 times per day. Peak concentrations in the brain occur 1 to 2 hours after administrations. Although the drug has a short half-life (0.5 to 1 hour) there are sufficient remaining dopamine cells in the brain to store dopamine and maintain its activity over several hours. As Parkinson's disease progresses, more dopamine cells die and the remaining cells cannot store sufficient dopamine to maintain its benefits: the duration of action of each dose decreases and patients need higher or more frequent doses. After 2-5 years as many as 50-75% of patients experience fluctuations in their response to L-DOPA: ON/OFF periods. Associated with the fluctuations, patients develop dyskinesias. The dyskinesias usually occur at the peak effect of L-DOPA but can also occur as the drug wears off, or at stressful times. The fluctuations and dyskinesias can seriously impact the patient's life. If L-DOPA is given continuously (through an intravenous pump) ON/OFF effects disappear and dyskinesias decrease. However, it is impractical to give L-DOPA intravenously.

When L-DOPA is taken alone part of it is changed outside the brain to dopamine by dopa-decarboxylase. The dopamine so produced cannot enter the brain and causes side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and appetite loss. Therefore L-DOPA is often combined with carbidopa or benserazide. Carbidopa blocks dopa-decarboxylase outside the brain allowing more L-DOPA to enter the brain without causing nausea, vomiting, and appetite loss. Atamet or Sinemet are tablets containing both carbidopa and L-DOPA. In combination with carbidopa, the half-life of L-DOPA is 1.2 to 2.3 hours.

Thirty years after its discovery, L-DOPA is still the best treatment for Parkinson's disease. In the early stages of the disease, patients usually enjoy a good response to L-DOPA, but as the disease progresses L-DOPA tends to become less helpful. This is not due to loss of L-DOPA efficacy, but rather to development of motor complications such as adverse fluctuations in motor response including end-of-dose deterioration or “wearing-off”, and the “ON/OFF fluctuations” and dyskinesias. ON/OFF fluctuations are a sudden, unacceptable loss of therapeutic benefit of a medication (‘ON’ state, during which the patient is relatively free from the symptoms of Parkinson's disease) and onset of the parkinsonian state (‘OFF’ state). Wearing off phenomenon is a decrease in the duration of L-DOPA action, and characterized by the gradual reappearance of the ‘off’ state, and shortening the ‘on’ state. Dyskinesia can be broadly classified as chorea (hyperkinetic, purposeless dance-like movements) and dystonia (sustained, abnormal muscle contractions). In 1974, Duvoisin first focused on these abnormal involuntary movements, and found that over half of patients with Parkinson's disease developed dyskinesia within six months of treatment. With increasing duration of treatment, there is an increase in both the frequency and severity of dyskinesia. In a seminal study of the potential benefits of possible neuroprotectants in Parkinson's disease—the DATATOP trial—L-DOPA induced dyskinesia was observed in 20-30% of patients who received L-DOPA treatment for a mean of 20.5 months. Ultimately, most L-DOPA treated patients experienced dyskinesia; up to 80% of patients developed dyskinesia within five years of treatment. Parkinson Study Group (1996); and Rascol et al. (2000). Treatment-related dyskinesias are not solely a problem of L-DOPA, as dopamine receptor agonists are also capable of eliciting dyskinesia. Thus, the common term “L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia” could be used to describe dopamine-treatment-related dyskinesia in general terms. Most dyskinesias occur when levodopa or other dopamine receptor agonists have a concentration in the brain that is sufficient to overactive dopamine receptors in the putamen (peak-dose-dyskinesia). However, dyskinesia also occurs when dopamine concentration is low (OFF dystonia) or in stages when the concentration of dopamine rises or falls (biphasic dyskinesia). Other movement disorders, such as myoclonus and akathisia, might also be components of the L-DOPA induced dyskinesia spectrum.

The biological basis of L-DOPA motor complications in Parkinson's disease is still far from clear. It has been suggested that they may involve not only advancing disease and continued loss of nigral neurons, but also changes of dopamine receptor sensitivity and their downstream expression of proteins, and genes, the sequence of events of which relate, at least in part, to the dose and method of administration of L-DOPA or dopamine agonists. Changes in non dopamine systems such as glutamate-mediated neurotransmission, GABA-mediated neurotransmission, and opioid peptide mediated transmission, might also be involved in the neuronal mechanisms that underlie L-DOPA motor complications in Parkinson's disease. Bezard et al. (2001). Notably, it seems that the short plasma half-life and consequent short duration of action of dopaminergic agents and the pulsatile stimulation of dopamine receptors by dopaminergic agents are associated with motor fluctuations and peak-dose-dyskinesias. All these events combine to produce alterations in the firing patterns that signal between the basal ganglia and the cortex.

Originally introduced as adjunctive therapy to L-DOPA in patients with fluctuations, dopamine agonists are now increasingly proposed as monotherapy in early patients. The antiparkinsonian effects of dopamine agonists, however, are usually less than those of L-DOPA, and after two to four years their efficacy wanes. When more potent treatment is required, low doses of L-DOPA can be “added on” to the agonist. An alternative strategy is to combine an agonist with low doses of L-DOPA from the beginning. Both strategies are purported to be as effective as L-DOPA and to have the advantage of significantly reducing the risk of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. These claims, however, are based upon a small number of pilot studies, all of which suffer from methodological shortcomings.

Additionally, dopamine receptor agonists are also capable of eliciting dyskinesia. Dopamine agonists also provoke dyskinesia in parkinsonian animals previously exposed by L-DOPA. Neuropsychiatric side effects, especially hallucination and psychosis, often limit the use of dopamine agonists. Despite the potential benefits provided by the adjunctive use of dopamine agonists, L-DOPA motor complications can thus be extremely difficult or even impossible to control. See, Olanow, Watts and Koller eds. (2001). Finally, dopamine agonists are sometimes used in monotherapy as substitutes for L-DOPA in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease and severe motor fluctuations and dyskinesias.

More recently, catecholamine-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors such as tolcapone and entacapone have been proposed as adjunctive therapy to L-DOPA. These compounds extend the plasma half-life of L-DOPA, without significantly increasing C_(max). Thus, they decrease the duration of wearing-off but tend to increase the intensity of peak-dose side effects including peak-dose-dyskinesias. Tolcapone appears to induce significant liver toxicity in a small percentage of patients.

Anti-cholinergics such as tri-hexiphenidyl (Artane) and piperidine (Cogentin) block the actions of acetylcholine in the brain. This may result in a mild to moderate degree of improvement in symptoms such as drooling and tremor. Patients above age 65 are likely to experience side effects such as dry mouth, blurred vision, constipation, confusion and hallucinations when treated with anti-cholinergics.

Dystonias

The term dystonia refers to a movement disorder characterized by sustained muscle contractions resulting in a persistently abnormal posture. Based on this definition, there are a number of dystonic syndromes, which can be subdivided according to their clinical features as: generalized (affecting all body parts); segmental (affecting adjacent body parts); or focal (restricted to a single body part). Focal dystonias include spasmodic torticollis, blepharospasm, hemifacial spasm, oromandibular dystonia, spasmodic dysphonia, and dystonic writer's cramp.

There are several degrees of dystonia. Some people can maintain a relatively normal life-style, while others are permanently hindered, often needing full time assistance.

Symptoms may be focal or limited to one region of the body, such as the neck or an arm or a leg. There are many different types of focal dystonia. Blepharospasm is marked by involuntary contraction of the muscles that control the movement of the eyelids. Symptoms may range from intermittent, painless, increased blinking to constant, painful, eye closure leading to functional blindness. In patients with cervical dystonia (CD), also known as spasmodic torticollis, muscle spasms of the head and neck may be painful and cause the neck to twist. These sometimes painful spasms may be intermittent or constant. Oromandibular and lingual dystonia is characterized by forceful contractions of the lower face causing the mouth to open or close. Chewing and unusual tongue movements may also occur. In spasmodic dysphonia (SD), also known as laryngeal dystonia, the muscles in the voice box (larynx) are affected. SD is marked by difficulties either opening or closing the vocal cords, causing the voice to have either a strained, hoarse, strangled, or whispering quality. In limb dystonia, there are involuntary contractions of one or more muscles in the arm, hand, leg, or foot. These types of focal dystonias include writer's cramp and other occupational dystonias.

Some patients have symptoms that are segmental or involve two adjacent areas of the body, such as the head and neck or arm and trunk. In other patients, symptoms may be multifocal or appear in two areas of the body that are not next to each other, such as the two arms, or an arm and a leg. In generalized dystonia, symptoms begin in an arm or a leg and advance, becoming more widespread. Eventually, the trunk and the rest of the body are involved.

Most cases of primary or idiopathic dystonia are believed to be hereditary and occur as the result of a faulty gene(s). In these patients, dystonia occurs as a solitary symptom and is not associated with an underlying disorder. For example, most cases of early-onset primary dystonia are due to a mutation in the DYT-1 gene. Early-onset dystonia that occurs as a result of this disease gene is the most common and severe type of hereditary dystonia. Other genetic causes of primary dystonia are rare.

Diseases involving dystonias include hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP), a group of genetic, degenerative disorders of the spinal cord characterized by progressive weakness and stiffness of the legs; Huntington's disease (HD) a hereditary progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the development of emotional, behavioral, and psychiatric abnormalities and movement abnormalities; multiple system atrophy (MSA) a neurodegenerative disease marked by a combination of symptoms affecting movement, blood pressure, and other body functions; pathologic myoclonus; progressive supranuclear palsy; restless legs syndrome; Rett syndrome; spasticity; Sydenham's chorea; Tourette syndrome; and Wilson disease.

Dystonia may occur because of another underlying disease process such as Wilson disease, multiple sclerosis, stroke, etc.; trauma to the brain, such as injury during a vehicular accident or anoxia during birth; or as a side effect of a medication. This type of dystonia is termed secondary or symptomatic dystonia. In adults, the most common type of secondary dystonia is tardive dystonia, which occurs as a result of the use of certain neuroleptic or antipsychotic drugs (used to treat psychiatric disorders). These drugs include haloperidol (Haldol®) or chlorpromazine (Thorazine®). Other drugs that block central dopamine receptors may also cause tardive dystonia. In most patients, symptoms occur some time after ongoing exposure to the drug. Table 1 provides a list of drugs that can cause dystonia.

TABLE 1 Generic (Trade Names) Acetophenazine (Tindal ®) Amoxapine (Asendin ®) Chlorpromazine (Thorazine ®) Fluphenazine (Permitil ®, Prolixin ®) Haloperidol (Haldol ®) Loxapine (Loxitane ®, Daxolin ®) Mesoridazine (Serentil ®) Metaclopramide (Reglan ®) Molindone (Lindone ®, Moban ®) Perphenazine (Trilafon ® or Triavil ®) Piperacetazine (Quide ®) Prochlorperazine (Compazine ®, Combid ®) Promazine (Sparine ®) Promethazine (Phenergan ®) Thiethylperazine (Torecan ®) Thioridazine (Mellaril ®) Thiothixene (Navane ®) Trifluoperazine (Stelazine ®) Triflupromazine (Vesprin ®) Trimeprazine (Temaril ®)

There are a number of options available to treat dystonia. Drugs may be used alone or in combination. In addition, they may be combined with other forms of treatment. Drugs currently in use include botulinum toxin (BTX), benzodiazepines, Baclofen, anticholinergics and dopamine-blocking agents/dopamine-depleting agents. Surgical treatment is also available and includes thalamotomy, pallidotomy, deep brain stimulation, myectomy (myotomy), ramisectomy, rhizotomy and peripheral denervation.

Tardive Dyskinesia and Other Extrapyramidal Syndromes

The extrapyramidal system of the nervous system is centered on the basal ganglia and influences motor control through pyramidal pathways, generally by means of input to the thalamus. When the extrapyramidal system is disturbed, motor control is affected and patients suffer extrapyramidal syndromes. These are a combination of neurological effects that include tremors, chorea, athetosis, and dystonia. This is a common side effect of neuroleptic agents. Other medications known to cause these reactions include haloperidol, molindone, perphenazine and aminotriptyline, loxapine, pimozide, and rarely, benzodiazepines.

Tardive dyskinesia is an involuntary neurological movement disorder. Depending upon the type of onset, a differential diagnosis might include Sydenham's chorea, Huntington's chorea, congenital torsion dystonia, hysteria, and the stereotyped behavior or mannerism of schizophrenia. American College of Neuropsychopharmacology-FDA Task Force (1973). Tardive dyskinesia results from the use of neuroleptic drugs that are prescribed to treat certain psychiatric or gastrointestinal conditions. Long-term use of these drugs may produce biochemical abnormalities in the striatum. Tardive dystonia is believed to be the more severe form of tardive dyskinesia.

Other closely related, untreatable neurological disorders have now been recognized as variants of tardive dyskinesia. Tardive akathisia involves painful feelings of inner tension and anxiety and a compulsive drive to move the body. In the extreme, the individual undergoes internal torture and can no longer sit still. Tardive dystonia involves muscle spasms, frequently of the face, neck and shoulders, and it too can be disfiguring, disabling and agonizing.

Treatment of tardive dyskinesia has been unsatisfactory. Removal of the antipsychotic agent is often advocated (Baldessarini (1990)) but often results in more severe forms of the movement disorder. Various pharmaceutical agents have been tried with some reported success; early investigators in this area turned their attention to reserpine (Serpasil®), tradename of Ciba-Geigy a compound known to deplete dopamine levels. Reserpine and α-methyldopa (Aldomet®) in the treatment of long-standing tardive dyskinesia showed that both compounds were statistically more effective than placebo in reducing symptomatology. Huang et al. (1981). However, another study showed that, catecholamine synthesis blockers such as α-methyldopa have not demonstrated a beneficial effect on tardive dyskinesia. AMPT, an experimental agent that inhibits tyrosine hydroxylase, the rate-limiting step in the synthesis of dopamine and norepinephrine, has shown partial reduction of dyskinesia.

Formerly, tardive dyskinesia was often treated by increasing the dose of the neuroleptic. This initially treats the pathophysiology of tardive dyskinesia but can aggravate the pathogenesis by further denervation and subsequent hypersensitivity. Thus, the movements may decrease or disappear initially but then reappear later. The use of the atypical neuroleptic, clozapine may be useful in certain situations in which patients with disfiguring tardive dyskinesia need neuroleptic treatment alternative.

Lithium interferes with the presynaptic release of monoamines as well as having other actions on the CNS. Two studies report mild improvement in tardive dyskinesia with lithium while two others report no improvement or exacerbation. Tepper and Haas (1979).

Oral pimozide caused improvement in degree of movement. Clayeria et al. (1975). Buspirone (BuSpar®), a partial serotonin receptor agonist, may also be useful in treating the condition. Moss et al. (1993). In rats, buspirone reverses the DA receptor subsensitivity induced by chronic neuroleptic administration, and it is this effect that may also occur in humans due to partial agonist effects at D2 receptors. Reports have associated tardive dyskinesia with reserpine, tetrabenazine, metoclopramide, tricyclic antidepressants, benztropine, phenyloin and amphetamines.

Other than neuroleptics, the drug that regularly produces dyskinesia is L-DOPA and other dopaminergic agents, in patients receiving these drugs for Parkinson's diseases. L-DOPA actually can improve neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia.

There is no accepted treatment for tardive dyskinesia. Casey (1999). Either discontinuing the offending antipsychotic or switching a patient to an atypical antipsychotic (with the possible exception of risperidone) may alleviate the movement disorder. The treatment of tardive dyskinesia has been recently reviewed. Egan et al. (1997). Most pharmacologic treatment strategies are directed toward reducing dopamine activity or enhancing CNS cholinergic effect. If the etiology of tardive dyskinesia relates to chronic dopaminergic receptor site blockade and the pathophysiology relates to the denervation hypersensitivity, agents that interrupt this sequence would, theoretically, be of potential benefit.

Many drugs have been tried in treating neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia. Because of differences in patient populations, study design, and doses of agents used, the results for individual agents are conflicting. Baldessarini and Tarsy (1978); and Klawans et al. (1980).

Amine depleting agents e.g., reserpine and tetrabenazine, act by blocking the reuptake of dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin into the presynaptic neuronal storage vesicles, thereby depleting the brain of these substances. Studies with these agents have indicated improvement in tardive dyskinesia but side effects have limited their use and the studies are of short duration. Short-term suppression may occur as reported with neuroleptics.

Several cholinergic agonists have been administered to patients with tardive dyskinesia. Choline chloride and phosphatidylcholine (lecithin), which are orally bioavailable precursors of acetylcholine, have been reported to be useful in short-term studies. Deanol acetaminobenzoate was originally reported to be efficacious in the treatment of tardive dyskinesia, but other studies have not confirmed these findings. Gelenberg et al. (1990).

There have been several attempts to treat tardive dyskinesia with drugs believed to potentiate central GABA mechanisms. Thaker et al. (1990). In a study involving 10 patients with tardive dyskinesia of greater than a 6 month duration, benztropine 2 mg IV increased dyskinetic movements in 7 patients and reduced them in the remaining three. Moore and Bowers (1980). In a preliminary report the β-adrenergic blocking agent propranolol (Inderal®) in a dose of 30-60 mg/day produced marked resolution of tardive dyskinesia within 1 to 10 days of treatment in four patients. Wilbur and Kulik (1980).

Several studies have examined the effectiveness of treating tardive dyskinesia with vitamin E. Adler et al. (1999); Lohr and Caligiuri (1996); Lohr et al. (1988); Elkashef et al. (1990); Shriqui et al. (1992); Egan et al. (1992); Adler et al. (1993a); Adler et al. (1993b); Goldberg (1996); McCreadie et al. (1994); Dabiri et al. (1993); Bischot et al. (1993); Akhtar et al. (1993); and Dabiri et al. (1994).

It was previously thought that in the majority of patients, tardive dyskinesia is permanent or irreversible. However, this is not necessarily the case. The earlier tardive dyskinesia is diagnosed and the neuroleptic discontinued, the better the prognosis for disorder reversal. In young adults, tardive dyskinesia disappears within several weeks after early drug withdrawal. Uhrbrand and Faurbye (1960); Itoh et al. (1981); Driesens (1988); and Gardos et al. (1994).

Table 2 summarizes various agents that have been used to treat tardive dyskinesia.

TABLE 2 Classes of Agents Specific agents Dopamine antagonists Butyrophenones, clozapine, metoclopramide (Karp et al. (1981)), papaverine (mechanism uncertain), phenothiazines, bromocriptine, pimozide Dopamine D2 Agonists Buspirone Amine-depleting agents Reserpine, tetrabenzine Blocker of catecholamine α-methyldopa, α-methyltyrosine (AMPT) synthesis Catecholamine release Lithium salts blocker Cholinergic agents Deanol, physostigmine, choline and lecithin GABA agonists Progabide (Bartholini (1983)), valproic acid, baclofen, iazepam, clonazepam Anticholinergic agents. Benztropine, trihexyphenidyl Moore et al. (1980) Agents with variable, α-methyldopa, amantadine, anticholinergics negligible, or uncertain antihistamines, apomorphine, barbiturates, effects benzodiazepines, methylphenidate, penicillamine, physostigmine, pyridoxine (B6), tryptophan, α-tocopherol (Vitamin E) Agents that worsen tardive Anticholinergic agents, antiparkinson agents (e.g., dyskinesia benztropine), dopamine agonists, amphetamines, L-DOPA Newer investigational agents endopioids, Substance P, Cholecystokinin, (peptides). Blurn et al. Ceruletide, Neurotensin, Cyclo-Leucine-Glycine (1983)

Other motor syndromes caused by the effects of neuroleptic drugs on the extrapyramidal system include drug induced parkinsonism, akathisia, dystonia, oculogyric crisis, and opisthotonus. Akathisia is a condition that is characterized by motor restlessness, which may range from anxiety to an inability to lie or sit quietly, or to sleep, and possible causes include a toxic reaction to neuroleptics such as phenothiazine. An oculogyric crisis is the paroxysmal, involuntary upward deviation of the eyes. The eyelids are often retracted. Attacks last from a few minutes to a few hours. It may occur in patients sensitive to phenothiazines, haloperidol, and metoclopramide. Opisthotonus is a form of spasm in which head, neck and spine are arched backwards

Adenosine A_(2A) Receptors

Adenosine is known to act via four major receptor subtypes, A₁, A_(2A), A_(2B), A₃, which have been characterized according to their primary sequences. Fredholm et al. (1994). Adenosine A₂ receptors are further divided into A_(2A) (high-affinity) and A_(2B) (low-affinity) subtypes. Daly et al. (1983); and Burns et al. (1986). In contrast to the widespread distribution of A₁, A_(2B), and A₃ receptors in the brain, A_(2A) receptors are highly localized to the basal ganglia, especially to the caudate-putamen (striatum), nucleus accumbens and globus pallidal, and the olfactory tubercles. Jarvis et al. (1989); and Schiffmann (1991b). The basal ganglia are located in the telencephalon and consist of several interconnected nuclei: the striatum, globus pallidus external segment (GPe), globus pallidus internal segment (GPi), substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc), substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr), and subthalamic nucleus (STN). The basal ganglia are a critical component of subcortical circuits involved in the integration of sensorimotor, associative, and limbic information to produce motor behavior. A major component of basal ganglia is the striatum, where GABAergic medium spiny neurons, which represent more than 90% of striatal neuronal population, are the only projection neurons.

The medium spiny neurons receive massive glutamatergic inputs from the cortex and thalamus, and project their GABAergic output onto the major output nuclei of basal ganglia, i.e. GPi and SNr, via the striatopallidal medium spiny neurons in an “indirect pathway” and the striatonigral medium spiny neurons in a “direct pathway.” Alexander et al. (1990); Gerfen (1992); and Graybiel (1990). The medium spiny neurons also receive intrastriatal GABAergic, cholinergic, and nigrostriatal dopaminergic modulatory inputs. Neurons of the striatonigral direct pathway contain GABA plus substance P/dynorphin and directly project from the striatum to GPi/SNr. These neurons provide a direct inhibitory effect on GPi/SNr neurons. Striatal neurons in the striatopallidal indirect pathway contain GABA plus enkephalin and connect the striatum with the GPi/SNr via synaptic connections in the GPe and STN. In these neurons, A_(2A) receptors are located almost exclusively on striatopallidal medium spiny neurons in the striatum and globus pallidus of the indirect pathway [Schiffmann et al. (1991a)], and acetylcholine-containing large aspiny interneurons in the striatum [Dixon et al. (1996)], and have been shown to modulate the neurotransmission of GABA, acetylcholine and glutamate. Kurokawa et al. (1996); Mori et al. (1996); Shindou et al. (2001); Ochi et al. (2000); Richardson et al. (1997); and Kase (2001).

Recent advances in neuroscience together with development of selective agents for the A_(2A) receptors have contributed to increased knowledge about adenosine and the adenosine A_(2A) receptor. Behavioral studies show that adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists improve motor dysfunction of several parkinsonian animal models (e.g., MPTP-treated monkeys), but also reveal features of A_(2A) receptor antagonists distinctive from dopaminergic agents. Richardson et al. (1997); and Kase (2001).

The antiparkinsonian effects of the selective adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist KW-6002 have been studied in MPTP-treated marmosets and cynomologus monkeys. Kanda et al. (1998a); Grondin et al. (1999); and Kanda et al. (2000). In MPTP-treated marmosets, oral administration of KW-6002 induced an increase in locomotor activity lasting up to 11 hours in a dose-related manner. Kanda et al. (1998a). Locomotor activity was increased to the level observed in normal animals whereas L-DOPA induced locomotor hyperactivity. Furthermore, in L-DOPA-primed MPTP-treated marmosets, treatment with KW-6002 for 21 days induced little or no dyskinesias whereas under the same conditions, treatment with L-DOPA induced marked dyskinesias. When KW-6002 (20 mg/kg) was administered once a day for 5 days with a threshold dose of L-DOPA to MPTP-treated marmosets primed to exhibit dyskinesias, antiparkinson activity was potentiated without an increase in dyskinesia. Kanda et al. (2000). KW-6002 also additively increased the antiparkinsonian effect of quinpirole, a dopamine D2 receptor agonist but not SKF80723, a dopamine D1 receptor agonist. Taken together, these findings suggest that adenosine A_(2A) antagonists might provide antiparkinsonian benefit as monotherapy in patients with early Parkinson's disease and might be able to improve antiparkinsonian response without increasing dyskinesia in L-DOPA-treated patients with motor complications.

Although the mechanisms by which adenosine A_(2A) antagonists exert an antiparkinsonian effect remain to be fully elucidated, the following mechanism is now proposed.

In either Parkinson's disease or MPTP treatment of primates, following destruction of the nigro-striatal dopaminergic pathway, the most relevant alteration is hyperactivity in the striatopallidal pathway, and such hyperactivity is attributed to an imbalance between the direct striatonigral pathway and the indirect striatopallidal pathway to give rise to parkinsonian state. DeLong (1990); and Obeso et al. (2000). It is noted that A_(2A) receptors are specifically expressed on a subpopulation of medium spiny neurons, the striatopallidal medium spiny neurons but not the striatonigral medium spiny neurons.

The GABAergic striatopallidal medium spiny projection neuron was found as one of major target neurons of A_(2A) receptor-mediated modulation. Kase (2001). Thus, in the striatum, A_(2A) receptors control excitability of the projection neurons through the intrastriatal GABAergic feedback/feedforward inhibition network [Mori et al (1996)], and in the globus pallidus (GPe), A_(2A) receptor activation enhances GABA release from the nerve terminals and might suppress excitability of GPe projection neurons, which project to subthalamus nucleus (STN) [Shindou et al. (2001)]. A_(2A) receptor antagonists selectively block this “dual modulation mechanism in the striatopallidal system”, leading to suppression of the excessive activation in the striatopallidal medium spiny neurons. This might shift the striatopallidal/striatonigral neuronal imbalance towards the normal state, resulting in recovery of the motor function in parkinsonean state. Ochi et al (2000); Kase (2001), Aoyama et al (2002).

The action mechanism via A_(2A) receptors could work independently of dopamine D₂ receptors (Aoyama et al. (2000)), which are co-localized with A_(2A) receptors in the striatopallidal medium spiny neurons. Gerfen et al. (1990). D₂ receptor knockout mice (D₂R−/−) presented a locomotor phenotype with analogies to Parkinson's disease and significantly altered in the levels of neuropeptide genes expressed in the striatal medium spiny neurons. No difference in the distribution and level of expression of A_(2A) receptor mRNA and the binding properties of the receptor were found between D₂R−/− and wild type mice, indicating that D₂ receptor absence had no influence on A_(2A) receptor properties. Blockade of A_(2A) receptors by KW-6002 reestablished their locomotor activity and coordination of movement and lowered the levels of striatal enkephalin expression to those in normal mice. Aoyama et al. (2000). The results indicate that A_(2A) and D₂ receptors have antagonistic but independent activities in controlling neuronal and motor function in the basal ganglia. Independent functioning of A_(2A) receptors from the dopaminergic system was confirmed by studies using A_(2A) and D₂ receptor knockout mice. Chen et al. (2001b).

Physiological and pathophysiological functions of A_(2A) receptors in L-DOPA motor complications in Parkinson's disease are far from clear. Neuronal mechanisms of L-DOPA induced dyskinesia are generally thought to involve the indirect rather than the direct pathway. Crossman (1990). L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias arise when the activity in the STN or GPi falls below a given level as a consequence of excessive inhibition from the GPe. Obeso et al. (1997). Another hypothesis that abnormalities primarily in the direct pathway might contribute significantly to the genesis of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia isproposed.

The neuroprotective effect of A_(2A) receptor antagonists has been demonstrated in neurotoxin (MPTP or 6-hydroxydopamine)-induced dopaminergic neurodegeneration in rats and mice and A_(2A) receptor knock-out mice. Ikeda et al. (2002); and Chen et al. (2001a). To date, no treatment has been successful in interfering with the basic pathogenic mechanism, which results in the death of dopaminergic neurons.

Therefore, non-dopaminergic drug therapies, which effect an adenosine A_(2A) receptor blockade, offer a means to treat Parkinson's disease. Moreover, adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists, which provide antiparkinsonian effects with little or no risk of typical dopaminergic drug adverse effects, i.e., increasing or developing motor complications, are desirable.

Some xanthine compounds are known to show adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonistic activity, anti-Parkinson's disease activity, antidepressant activity, inhibitory activity on neurodegeneration, or the like (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,484,920; 5,587,378; and 5,543,415; EP 1016407A1; etc.)

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides methods of reducing or suppressing the adverse effectiveness of L-DOPA therapy comprising administration or co-administration of one or more A_(2A) receptor antagonists to Parkinson's disease patients. Such treatment can be therapeutic such as to treat patients suffering from L-DOPA- or other dopaminergic-agent-induced motor complications to reduce OFF time and/or to improve dyskinesias.

The present invention further provides methods and compositions for L-DOPA-sparing treatment. The method comprises administering to a patient in need thereof a combination of a sub-clinically effective amount of L-DOPA and one or more adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists in an amount effective to render the L-DOPA efficacious.

The present invention further provides methods of treating Parkinson's disease and/or L-DOPA motor complications, comprising administering an effective amount of at least one adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist in combination with a COMT inhibitor and/or DA and/or MAO inhibitor.

The present invention also provides methods of prolonging effective treatment of Parkinson's disease comprising administering to a patient in need thereof either an adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist or a combination of an adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist and a dopamine agonist without prior or subsequent administration of L-DOPA or dopaminergic agents, such that the patient's need for L-DOPA therapy or add-on L-DOPA therapy is delayed or removed entirely, delaying the onset of or preventing the development of L-DOPA motor complications.

The invention also includes methods of treating movement disorders comprising administering an effective amount of at least one adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist to a patient in need thereof. Such treatment can be therapeutic such as to treat tremors, bradykinesias, gait, dystonias, dyskinesias, tardive dyskinesias, or other extrapyramidal syndromes, or preventative such as to prevent or lessen the effects of drugs that cause movement disorders.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a graph depicting the change in hours OFF as recorded on home diaries for placebo and combined KW-6002 groups. At 12 weeks, subjects treated with KW-6002 had a significantly greater reduction in hours OFF (*p=0.004).

FIG. 2 is a graph depicting the effect of KW-6002 on nigral GABA (2A) and glutamate (2B) levels in 6-hydroxydopamine lesion rats. GABA and glutamate levels are expressed as percentage changes from the pre-values before administration of the compound. KW-6002 at 1 mg/kg p.o. significantly increased nigral GABA and glutamate levels.

FIG. 3 is a graph depicting the effect of L-DOPA on nigral GABA (3A) and glutamate (3B) levels in 6-hydroxydopamine lesion rats. L-DOPA induced significant increases of nigral GABA and glutamate to levels similar to those by KW-6002.

FIG. 4 is a graph depicting the time courses of the effect of KW-6002 and L-DOPA on total abnormal involuntary movements (AIMs) score in chronically L-DOPA-treated 6-hydroxdopmanine lesion rats. L-DOPA elicited marked AIMs, whereas KW-6002 induced little or no AIMs.

FIG. 5 is a graph depicting the time courses of the effect of KW-6002 and L-DOPA on nigral GABA (5A) and glutamate (5B) levels in chronically L-DOPA-treated 6-hydroxydopamine lesion rats. L-DOPA increased glutamate levels without effect on nigral GABA levels. KW-6002 gave no or little effects on nigral GABA and glutamate levels.

FIG. 6 is a graph depicting the effect of KW-6002 on antiparkinsonian response to L-DOPA during the treatment L-DOPA alone (L-DOPA/benserazide; 100/25 mg (total dose) once daily) and L-DOPA plus KW-6002 (90 mg/kg once daily) in cynomologus monkeys. The antiparkinsonian response to L-DOPA in terms of improvement of the parkinsonian score over four weeks in was stable and comparable in the two groups.

FIG. 7 is a graph depicting the effect of KW-6002 on Locomotor response to L-DOPA during the treatment L-DOPA alone (L-DOPA/benserazide; 100/25 mg (total dose) once daily) and L-DOPA plus KW-6002 (90 mg/kg once daily) in cynomologus monkeys. The locomotor activity counts increased to a higher level in the combination treatment group and its level was maintained over four weeks.

FIG. 8 is a graph depicted the effect of KW-6002 on dyskinetic response to L-DOPA during the treatment L-DOPA alone (L-DOPA/benserazide; 100/25 mg (total dose) once daily) and L-DOPA plus KW-6002 (90 mg/kg once daily) in cynomologus monkeys. Dyskinesias increased more rapidly and reached a higher level in the L-DOPA group than in the combination treatment group. The onset of dyskinesia was delayed in the presence of KW-6002.

FIG. 9 is a graph depicted the effect of KW-6002 on L-DOPA induced dyskinesias. KW-6002 was administered simultaneously when L-DOPA (2.5 mg/kg p.o. plus benserazide 0.625 mg/kg p.o.) was administered daily for 21 days to induce dyskinesia in MPTP-treated common marmosets primed with L-DOPA to exhibit dyskinesia. The animals previously received 28 days of L-DOPA at 10 mg/kg p.o. plus benserazide at 2.5 mg/kg p.o. twice daily (L-DOPA). The amplitude of involuntary movements produced by the combined treatment was not increased, but instead reduced significantly on day 21 as compared with 2.5 mg/kg of L-DOPA alone.

KW-6002 showed significant reduction of L-DOPA induced dyskinesias by chronic treatment for 21 days.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the following (1) to (50).

(1) A method of reducing or suppressing the adverse effectiveness of L-DOPA and/or dopamine agonist therapy, comprising administering an effective amount of at least one adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist to a Parkinson's disease patient.

(2) The method according to the above (1) wherein the patient suffers from L-DOPA- or other dopaminergic-agent-induced motor complications.

(3) The method according to the above (2) wherein OFF time in motor fluctuations is reduced.

(4) The method according to the above (2) wherein dyskinesias in motor complications are improved.

(5) The method according to the above (1) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is a xanthine derivative or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

(6) The method according to the above (1) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is represented by formula (I):

wherein

R¹, R² and R³ represent independently hydrogen, lower alkyl, lower alkenyl or lower alkynyl; R⁴ represents cycloalkyl, —(CH₂)_(n)—R⁵ (in which R⁵ represents substituted or unsubstituted aryl, or a substituted or unsubstituted heterocyclic group; and n is an integer of 0 to 4), or

{in which Y¹ and Y² represent independently hydrogen, halogen, or lower alkyl; and Z represents substituted or unsubstituted aryl, or

(in which R⁶ represents hydrogen, hydroxy, lower alkyl, lower alkoxy, halogen, nitro, or amino; and m represents an integer of 1 to 3)}; and X¹ and X² represent independently O or S.

(7) The method according to the above (1) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is represented by formula (I-A):

wherein R^(1a) and R^(2a) represent independently methyl or ethyl; R^(3a) represents hydrogen or lower alkyl; and Z^(a) represents

(in which at least one of R⁷, R⁸ and R⁹ represents lower alkyl or lower alkoxy and the others represent hydrogen; R¹⁰ represents hydrogen or lower alkyl) or

(in which R⁶ and m have the same meanings as defined above, respectively).

(8) The method according to the above (1) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is represented by formula (I-B):

wherein R^(1b) and R^(2b) represent independently hydrogen, propyl, butyl, lower alkenyl or lower alkynyl; R^(3b) represents hydrogen or lower alkyl; Z^(b) represents substituted or unsubstituted naphthyl, or

(in which R⁶ and m have the same meanings as defined above); and Y¹ and Y² have the same meanings as defined above, respectively.

(9) The method according to the above (1) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is (E)-8-(3,4-dimethoxystyryl)-1,3-diethyl-7-methylxanthine.

(10) A method for L-DOPA sparing treatment comprising administering to a patient in need thereof a combination of a sub-clinically effective amount of L-DOPA and one or more adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists in an amount effective to render the L-DOPA efficacious.

(11) The method according to the above (10) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is a xanthine derivative or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

(12) The method according to the above (10) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is represented by formula (I):

wherein

R¹, R² and R³ represent independently hydrogen, lower alkyl, lower alkenyl or lower alkynyl; R⁴ represents cycloalkyl, —(CH₂)_(n)—R⁵ (in which R⁵ represents substituted or unsubstituted aryl, or a substituted or unsubstituted heterocyclic group; and n is an integer of 0 to 4), or

{in which Y¹ and Y² represent independently hydrogen, halogen, or lower alkyl; and Z represents substituted or unsubstituted aryl, or

(in which R⁶ represents hydrogen, hydroxy, lower alkyl, lower alkoxy, halogen, nitro, or amino; and m represents an integer of 1 to 3)}; and X¹ and X² represent independently O or S.

(13) The method according to the above (10) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is represented by formula (I-A):

wherein R^(1a) and R^(2a) represent independently methyl or ethyl; R^(3a) represents hydrogen or lower alkyl; and Z^(a) represents

(in which at least one of R⁷, R⁸ and R⁹ represents lower alkyl or lower alkoxy and the others represent hydrogen; R¹⁰ represents hydrogen or lower alkyl) or

(in which R⁶ and m have the same meanings as defined above, respectively).

(14) The method according to the above (10) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is represented by formula (I-B):

wherein R^(1b) and R^(2b) represent independently hydrogen, propyl, butyl, lower alkenyl or lower alkynyl; R^(3b) represents hydrogen or lower alkyl; Z^(b) represents substituted or unsubstituted naphthyl, or

(in which R⁶ and m have the same meanings as defined above, respectively); and Y¹ and Y² have the same meanings as defined above, respectively.

(15) The method according to the above (10) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is (E)-8-(3,4-dimethoxystyryl)-1,3-diethyl-7-methylxanthine.

(16) A composition for L-DOPA sparing treatment comprising a sub-clinically effective amount of L-DOPA and one or more adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists in an amount of effective to render the L-DOPA efficacious.

(17) The composition according to the above (16) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is a xanthine derivative or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

(18) The composition according to the above (16) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is represented by formula (I):

wherein

R¹, R² and R³ represent independently hydrogen, lower alkyl, lower alkenyl or lower alkynyl; R⁴ represents cycloalkyl, —(CH₂)_(n)—R⁵ (in which R⁵ represents substituted or unsubstituted aryl, or a substituted or unsubstituted heterocyclic group; and n is an integer of 0 to 4), or

{in which Y¹ and Y² represent independently hydrogen, halogen, or lower alkyl; and Z represents substituted or unsubstituted aryl, or

(in which R⁶ represents hydrogen, hydroxy, lower alkyl, lower alkoxy, halogen, nitro, or amino; and m represents an integer of 1 to 3)}; and X¹ and X² represent independently O or S.

(19) The composition according to the above (16) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is represented by formula (I-A):

wherein R^(1a) and R^(2a) represent independently methyl or ethyl; R^(3a) represents hydrogen or lower alkyl; and Z^(a) represents

(in which at least one of R⁷, R⁸ and R⁹ represents lower alkyl or lower alkoxy and the others represent hydrogen; R¹⁰ represents hydrogen or lower alkyl) or

(in which R⁶ and m have the same meanings as defined above, respectively).

(20) The composition according to the above (16) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is represented by formula (I-B):

wherein R^(1b) and R^(2b) represent independently hydrogen, propyl, butyl, lower alkenyl or lower alkynyl; R^(3b) represents hydrogen or lower alkyl; Z^(b) represents substituted or unsubstituted naphthyl, or

(in which R⁶ and m have the same meanings as defined above, respectively); and Y¹ and Y² have the same meanings as defined above, respectively.

(21) The composition according to the above (16) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is (E)-8-(3,4-dimethoxystyryl)-1,3-diethyl-7-methylxanthine.

(22) A method of treating Parkinson's disease and/or L-DOPA motor complications, comprising administering an effective amount of at least one adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist in combination with a COMT inhibitor and/or DA and/or MAO inhibitor to a patient in need thereof.

(23) The method according to the above (22) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is a xanthine derivative or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

(24) The method according to the above (22) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is represented by formula (I):

wherein

R¹, R² and R³ represent independently hydrogen, lower alkyl, lower alkenyl or lower alkynyl; R⁴ represents cycloalkyl, —(CH₂)_(n)—R⁵ (in which R⁵ represents substituted or unsubstituted aryl, or a substituted or unsubstituted heterocyclic group; and n is an integer of 0 to 4), or

{in which Y¹ and Y² represent independently hydrogen, halogen, or lower alkyl; and Z represents substituted or unsubstituted aryl, or

(in which R⁶ represents hydrogen, hydroxy, lower alkyl, lower alkoxy, halogen, nitro, or amino; and m represents an integer of 1 to 3)}; and X¹ and X² represent independently O or S.

(25) The method according to the above (22) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is represented by formula (I-A):

wherein R^(1a) and R^(2a) represent independently methyl or ethyl; R^(3a) represents hydrogen or lower alkyl; and Z^(a) represents

(in which at least one of R⁷, R⁸ and R⁹ represents lower alkyl or lower alkoxy and the others represent hydrogen; R¹⁰ represents hydrogen or lower alkyl) or

(in which R⁶ and m have the same meanings as defined above, respectively).

(26) The method according to the above (22) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is represented by formula (I-B):

wherein R^(1b) and R^(2b) represent independently hydrogen, propyl, butyl, lower alkenyl or lower alkynyl; R^(3b) represents hydrogen or lower alkyl; Z^(b) represents substituted or unsubstituted naphthyl, or

(in which R⁶ and m have the same meanings as defined above, respectively); and Y¹ and Y² have the same meanings as defined above, respectively.

(27) The method according to the above (22) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is (E)-8-(3,4-dimethoxystyryl)-1,3-diethyl-7-methylxanthine.

(28) A composition for the treatment of Parkinson's disease comprising an effective amount of at least one adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist, and a COMT inhibitor and/or DA and/or MAO inhibitor.

(29) The composition according to the above (28) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is a xanthine derivative or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

(30) The composition according to the above (28) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is represented by formula (I):

wherein

R¹, R² and R³ represent independently hydrogen, lower alkyl, lower alkenyl or lower alkynyl; R⁴ represents cycloalkyl, —(CH₂)_(n)—R⁵ (in which R⁵ represents substituted or unsubstituted aryl, or a substituted or unsubstituted heterocyclic group; and n is an integer of 0 to 4), or

{in which Y¹ and Y² represent independently hydrogen, halogen, or lower alkyl; and Z represents substituted or unsubstituted aryl, or

(in which R⁶ represents hydrogen, hydroxy, lower alkyl, lower alkoxy, halogen, nitro, or amino; and m represents an integer of 1 to 3)}; and X¹ and X² represent independently O or S.

(31) The composition according to the above (28) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is represented by formula (I-A):

wherein R^(1a) and R^(2a) represent independently methyl or ethyl; R^(3a) represents hydrogen or lower alkyl; and Z^(a) represents

(in which at least one of R⁷, R⁸ and R⁹ represents lower alkyl or lower alkoxy and the others represent hydrogen; R¹⁰ represents hydrogen or lower alkyl) or

(in which R⁶ and m have the same meanings as defined above, respectively).

(32) The composition according to the above (28) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is represented by formula (I-B):

wherein R^(1b) and R^(2b) represent independently hydrogen, propyl, butyl, lower alkenyl or lower alkynyl; R^(3b) represents hydrogen or lower alkyl; Z^(b) represents substituted or unsubstituted naphthyl, or

(in which R⁶ and m have the same meanings as defined above, respectively); and Y¹ and Y² have the same meanings as defined above, respectively.

(33) The composition according to the above (28) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is (E)-8-(3,4-dimethoxystyryl)-1,3-diethyl-7-methylxanthine.

(34) A method of prolonging effective treatment of Parkinson's disease comprising administering to a patient in need thereof either an adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist or a combination of an adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist and a dopamine agonist in an amount effective to delay or remove the patient's need for add-on L-DOPA therapy.

(35) The method according to the above (34) wherein the development of motor complications is delayed.

(36) The method according to the above (34) wherein the patient has not had prior administration of L-DOPA or a dopaminergic agent.

(37) The method according to the above (34) wherein the patient does not have subsequent administration of L-DOPA or a dopaminergic agent.

(38) The method according to the above (34) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is a xanthine derivative or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

(39) The method according to the above (34) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is represented by formula (I):

wherein

R¹, R² and R³ represent independently hydrogen, lower alkyl, lower alkenyl or lower alkynyl; R⁴ represents cycloalkyl, —(CH₂)_(n)—R⁵ (in which R⁵ represents substituted or unsubstituted aryl, or a substituted or unsubstituted heterocyclic group; and n is an integer of 0 to 4), or

{in which Y¹ and Y² represent independently hydrogen, halogen, or lower alkyl; and Z represents substituted or unsubstituted aryl, or

(in which R⁶ represents hydrogen, hydroxy, lower alkyl, lower alkoxy, halogen, nitro, or amino; and m represents an integer of 1 to 3)}; and X¹ and X² represent independently O or S.

(40) The method according to the above (34) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is represented by formula (I-A):

wherein R^(1a) and R^(ea) represent independently methyl or ethyl; R^(1a) represents hydrogen or lower alkyl; and Z^(a) represents

(in which at least one of R⁷, R⁸ and R⁹ represents lower alkyl or lower alkoxy and the others represent hydrogen; R¹⁰ represents hydrogen or lower alkyl) or

(in which R⁶ and m have the same meanings as defined above, respectively).

(41) The method according to the above (34) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is represented by formula (I-B):

wherein R^(1b) and R^(2b) represent independently hydrogen, propyl, butyl, lower alkenyl or lower alkynyl; R^(3b) represents hydrogen or lower alkyl; Z^(b) represents substituted or unsubstituted naphthyl, or

(in which R⁶ and m have the same meanings as defined above, respectively); and Y¹ and Y² have the same meanings as defined above, respectively.

(42) The method according to the above (34) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is (E)-8-(3,4-dimethoxystyryl)-1,3-diethyl-7-methylxanthine.

(43) A method of treating movement disorders comprising administrating an effective amount of at least one adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist to a patient in need thereof.

(44) The method according to the above (43) wherein the patient suffers from tremors, bradykinesias, gait, dystonias, dyskinesias, tardive dyskinesias or other extrapyramidal syndromes.

(45) The method according to the above (43) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist lessens the effects of drugs that cause movement disorders.

(46) The method according to the above (43) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is a xanthine derivative or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

(47) The method according to the above (43) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is represented by formula (I):

wherein

R¹, R² and R³ represent independently hydrogen, lower alkyl, lower alkenyl or lower alkynyl; R⁴ represents cycloalkyl, —(CH₂)_(n)—R⁵ (in which R⁵ represents substituted or unsubstituted aryl, or a substituted or unsubstituted heterocyclic group; and n is an integer of 0 to 4), or

{in which Y¹ and Y² represent independently hydrogen, halogen, or lower alkyl; and Z represents substituted or unsubstituted aryl, or

(in which R⁶ represents hydrogen, hydroxy, lower alkyl, lower alkoxy, halogen, nitro, or amino; and m represents an integer of 1 to 3)}; and X¹ and X² represent independently O or S.

(48) The method according to the above (43) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is represented by formula (I-A):

wherein R^(1a) and R^(2a) represent independently methyl or ethyl; R^(3a) represents hydrogen or lower alkyl; and Z^(a) represents

(in which at least one of R⁷, R⁸ and R⁹ represents lower alkyl or lower alkoxy and the others represent hydrogen; R¹⁰ represents hydrogen or lower alkyl) or

(in which R⁶ and m have the same meanings as defined above, respectively).

(49) The method according to the above (43) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is represented by formula (I-B):

wherein R^(1b) and R^(2b) represent independently hydrogen, propyl, butyl, lower alkenyl or lower alkynyl; R^(3b) represents hydrogen or lower alkyl; Z^(b) represents substituted or unsubstituted naphthyl, or

(in which R⁶ and m have the same meanings as defined above, respectively); and Y¹ and Y² have the same meanings as defined above, respectively.

(50) The method according to the above (43) wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is (E)-8-(3,4-dimethoxystyryl)-1,3-diethyl-7-methylxanthine.

The present invention is directed to methods of treating patients suffering from movement disorders comprising administering one or more adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists. By “adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist” is meant a compound that inhibits, suppresses or causes the cessation of at least one adenosine-mediated biological activity by, e.g., binding to adenosine A_(2A) receptors, interfering with, or preventing the binding of adenosine to the receptor.

The present invention contemplates that adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists can be used to treat movement disorders, since the adenosine A_(2A) receptor functions, for example, in controlling the indirect pathway or basal ganglia output nuclei activity. The adenosine A_(2A) receptors are also considered to be involved in controlling motor behavior or motor dysfunctions.

An adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist functions in several ways. The antagonist may bind to or sequester adenosine with sufficient affinity and specificity to substantially interfere with, block or otherwise prevent binding of adenosine to an adenosine A_(2A) receptor, thereby inhibiting, suppressing or causing the cessation of one or more adenosine A_(2A) receptor-mediated biological functions, such as modulation of striatal GABAergic output of the indirect pathway, and activities of the basal ganglia output nuclei, SNr, for example, thereby controlling motor behaviors in basal ganglia. The present invention contemplates that antiparkinsonian activity of the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist results from this activity. The present invention further contemplates that the capability of the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist to reduce or suppress the adverse effectiveness of L-DOPA and/or dopamine agonist therapy in Parkinson's disease patients results from this activity. The present invention further contemplate that involvement of the adenosine receptor antagonists in development of L-DOPA and/or dopamine agonist induced motor complications results from this activity. Alternatively, an adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist may inhibit neuron degeneration cascades induced by dopaminergic neurotoxins such as 6-OHDA (6-hydroxydopamine) and 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) and dopaminergic neurotoxin production via glial cells. These features of adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists prevent the development of L-DOPA motor complications and/or progress of Parkinson's disease. Thus, the use of adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists provide therapy such that the patient's need for L-DOPA therapy or add-on L-DOPA therapy is delayed or removed entirely, or delaying the onset of or preventing the development of L-DOPA motor complications.

The adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists of the present invention are thus directed to methods of treating Parkinson's disease patients and other patients suffering from movement disorders by administering an effective amount of one or more adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists. The adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists of the present invention are also useful in methods of reducing or suppressing the adverse effectiveness of L-DOPA therapy including L-DOPA motor complications in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Furthermore, treatment of Parkinson's disease with adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists can avoid the need for treatment with L-DOPA and reduce the amounts of L-DOPA required to effectively treat Parkinson's disease in the absence or reduction of side effects such as, nausea, hyperactivity, motor fluctuations such as wearing off and ON-OFF fluctuations, and dyskinesia. The present invention further provides methods for treating Parkinson's disease patients by administering adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists such that the patient's need for L-DOPA therapy is delayed or removed entirely, delaying the onset of or preventing the development of L-DOPA motor complications. The present invention further provides methods for treating tremors, bradykinesias, gait, dystonias, and tardive dyskinesias and other extrapyramidal syndromes in patients suffering from other movement disorders.

The adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist used in the present invention is not limited as long as it has A_(2A) receptor antagonistic activity. Examples thereof include compounds disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,484,920, U.S. Pat. No. 5,703,085, WO 92/06976, WO 94/01114, U.S. Pat. No. 5,565,460, WO 98/42711, WO 00/17201, WO 99/43678, WO 01/92264, WO 99/35147, WO 00/13682, WO 00/13681, WO 00/69464, WO 01/40230, WO 01/02409, WO 01/02400, EP 1054012, WO 01/62233, WO 01/17999, WO 01/80893, WO 02/14282, WO 01/97786, and the like. More specifically, examples include:

(1) compounds represented by the following formula (I):

wherein

R¹, R² and R³ represent independently hydrogen, lower alkyl, lower alkenyl or lower alkynyl; R⁴ represents cycloalkyl, —(CH₂)_(n)—R⁵ (in which R⁵ represents substituted or unsubstituted aryl, or a substituted or unsubstituted heterocyclic group; and n is an integer of 0 to 4), or

{in which Y¹ and Y² represent independently hydrogen, halogen, or lower alkyl; and Z represents substituted or unsubstituted aryl, or

(in which R⁶ represents hydrogen, hydroxy, lower alkyl, lower alkoxy, halogen, nitro, or amino; and m represents an integer of 1 to 3)}; and X¹ and X² represent independently O or S,

(2) compounds represented by the following formula (I-A):

wherein R^(1a) and R^(2a) represent independently methyl or ethyl; R^(3a) represents hydrogen or lower alkyl; and Z^(a) represents

(in which at least one of R⁷, R⁸ and R⁹ represents lower alkyl or lower alkoxy and the others represent hydrogen; R¹⁰ represents hydrogen or lower alkyl) or

(in which R⁶ and m have the same meanings as defined above, respectively), and

(3) compounds represented by the following formula (I-B):

wherein R^(1b) and R^(2b) represent independently hydrogen, propyl, butyl, lower alkenyl or lower alkynyl; R^(3b) represents hydrogen or lower alkyl; Z^(b) represents substituted or unsubstituted naphthyl, or

(in which R⁶ and m have the same meanings as defined above, respectively); and Y¹ and Y² have the same meanings as defined above, respectively,

and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof.

In the definitions of the groups of formula (I), formula (I-A), and formula (I-B), the lower alkyl and the lower alkyl moiety of the lower alkoxy mean a straight-chain or branched alkyl group having 1 to 6 carbon atoms, such as methyl, ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, butyl, isobutyl, sec-butyl, tert-butyl, pentyl, neopentyl, and hexyl. The lower alkenyl means a straight-chain or branched alkenyl group having 2 to 6 carbon atoms, such as vinyl, allyl, methacryl, crotyl, 3-butenyl, 2-pentenyl, 4-pentenyl, 2-hexenyl, and 5-hexenyl. The lower alkynyl means a straight-chain or branched alkynyl group having 2 to 6 carbon atoms, such as ethynyl, propargyl, 2-butyryl, 3-butyryl, 2-pentynyl, 4-pentynyl, 2-hexynyl, 5-hexynyl, and 4-methyl-2-pentynyl. The aryl means phenyl or naphthyl. The cycloalkyl means a cycloalkyl group having 3 to 8 carbon atoms, such as cyclopropyl, cyclobutyl, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl, cycloheptyl, and cyclooctyl. Examples of the heterocyclic group are furyl, thienyl, pyrrolyl, pyranyl, thiopyranyl, pyridyl, thiazolyl, imidazolyl, pyrimidyl, triazinyl, indolyl, quinolyl, purinyl, and benzothiazolyl. The halogen includes fluorine, chlorine, bromine, and iodine.

The substituted aryl, the substituted heterocyclic group, and the substituted naphthyl each have 1 to 4 independently selected substituents. Examples of the substituents are lower alkyl, hydroxy, substituted or unsubstituted lower alkoxy, halogen, nitro, amino, lower alkylamino, di(lower alkyl)amino, trifluoromethyl, trifluoromethoxy, benzyloxy, phenyl, and phenoxy. The lower alkyl and the lower alkyl moiety of the lower alkoxy, lower alkylamino, and di(lower alkyl)amino have the same meaning as the lower alkyl defined above. The halogen has the same meaning as the halogen defined above. Examples of the substituent of the substituted lower alkoxy are hydroxy, lower alkoxy, halogen, amino, azide, carboxy, and lower alkoxycarbonyl. The lower alkyl moiety of the lower alkoxy and lower alkoxycarbonyl has the same meaning as the lower alkyl defined above, and the halogen has the same meaning as the halogen defined above.

The above-mentioned pharmaceutically acceptable salts of Compounds (I), Compounds (I-A), and Compounds (I-B) include pharmaceutically acceptable acid addition salts, metal salts, ammonium salts, organic amine addition salts, and amino acid addition salts.

Examples of the pharmaceutically acceptable acid addition salts are inorganic acid addition salts such as hydrochloride, sulfate and phosphate, and organic acid addition salts such as acetate, maleate, fumarate, tartrate, and citrate. Examples of the pharmaceutically acceptable metal salts are alkali metal salts such as sodium salt and potassium salt, alkaline earth metal salts such as magnesium salt and calcium salt, aluminum salt and zinc salt. Examples of the pharmaceutically acceptable ammonium salts are ammonium and tetramethylammonium. Examples of the pharmaceutically acceptable organic amine addition salts are salts with morpholine and piperidine. Examples of the pharmaceutically acceptable amino acid addition salts are salts with lysine, glycine and phenylalanine.

Compounds represented by formula (I), formula (I-A), and formula (I-B) are described and synthesized in accordance with the methodology described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,543,415; 5,587,378; and 5,484,920.

A preferred adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist useful in accordance with the methods of the present invention comprises (E)-8-(3,4-dimethoxystyryl)-1,3-diethyl-7-methylxanthine (the following formula (II)).

Formula II is also identified in accordance with the present invention as KW-6002.

By “reducing or suppressing the adverse effectiveness of L-DOPA” is understood in accordance with the present invention to mean that the compounds of the present invention reduce the patients' amount of awake time in an “OFF” state. An OFF state is understood in accordance with the invention to mean the period of time where the therapeutic benefit of a dose of a parkinsonian medication have worn off, such that the patient experiences symptoms of Parkinson's disease such as are classified by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and the Hoehn and Yahr (HY) scale, for example.

The present invention is also directed to reducing the adverse effectiveness of L-DOPA by increasing the proportion of the patients' awake time in an “ON” state. By ON state is meant, the period of time following a dose of a parkinsonian medication during which the patient is relatively free of the symptoms of Parkinson's Disease as classified by the UPDRS and the HY scale. The present invention is also directed to suppressing adverse effectiveness of L-DOPA by suppressing L-DOPA induced dyskinesia. Dyskinesias can be separately measured by the UPDRS, modified Goetz Dyskinesia Rating Scale (MGDRS), and/or Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS).

Patients treatable by the methods of the present invention include patients at early, intermediate and advanced stages of Parkinson's disease with or without motor complications as determined by the Parkinson Dyskinesia Scale (PDS).

In accordance with the present invention the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists of the present invention can be co-administered with L-DOPA or a dopamine agonist, i.e. administered at substantially the same time. It is also contemplated that the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists can be administered alone; either before or after the patient receives a dose of L-DOPA or a dopamine agonist. A substantial reduction in the requirement for L-DOPA and/or a reduction or a suppression in the typical adverse effects of L-DOPA therapy are observed with the administration of KW-6002, especially in the symptoms of motor fluctuations and dyskinesia. Thus, the present invention contemplates an improved method of treating the patients suffering from L-DOPA- or other dopaminergic agents-induced motor complications in Parkinson's disease in humans by administering an adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist with L-DOPA or other dopaminergic agents that cause motor fluctuations, dyskinesia, nausea, and other common side effects of dopaminergic therapy.

The present invention further provides a method of prolonging effective treatment of Parkinson's disease comprising the administration of either an adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist or a combination of an adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist and a dopamine agonist without prior or subsequent administration of L-DOPA. The requirement for L-DOPA is eliminated or at least substantially reduced together with the avoidance of the concomitant adverse side effects of L-DOPA therapy. A “combination” of an adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist and a dopamine agonist is provided to a patient concurrently or at least in a manner such as to permit an overlap of biological activity. Since the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists of the invention interfere with the development of L-DOPA motor complications and also prevent dopaminergic neurodegeneration, an adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist administered singly or together with a dopamine agonist can delay the onset of or prevent the progress of L-DOPA motor complications

In accordance with the present invention, the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists can be administered singly or together with a dopamine agonist such as, for example, bromocriptine, cabergoline, pramipexol, ropinerole, or pergolide, and thereby avoid or at least provide an extension of time before which the need for L-DOPA manifests.

The present invention further provides methods of L-DOPA-sparing treatment of Parkinson's patients. That is, treatment with sub-clinically effective amounts of L-DOPA while maintaining the efficacy of sub-clinically effective amounts of L-DOPA. The method comprises treating the patient with sub-clinically effective amounts of L-DOPA and effective amounts of an adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist. By sub-clinically effective amounts of L-DOPA is meant an amount of L-DOPA that is not effective in treatment of a particular patient. Typically, L-DOPA is administered at 100 mg to 1 g per day in divided doses (usually 250 mg 4 times a day). The dose is increased gradually in increments of 100 to 750 mg a day at 3- to 7-day intervals until intolerable side effects occur, usually movement disorders. When co-administered with carbidopa, effective amounts of L-DOPA are reduced. It is well within the skill of one in the art to determine the sub-clinically effective dose of L-DOPA for a particular patient and to adjust it accordingly in the presence of an adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist.

Compositions comprising sub-clinically effective amounts of L-DOPA and optionally an adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist and optionally a dopamine antagonist are made by methods known in the art and described herein. Additional amounts of carbidopa and other active ingredients can also be determined by one of skill in the art.

The present invention further provides methods of treating Parkinson's disease with at least one adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist and at least one of a COMT or MAO-B inhibitor. The compositions can be administered together or sequentially, by any method known in the art. Methods of making and administering such compositions are known in the art. Suitable COMT and MAO inhibitors are described herein and are well known in the art. These include, but are not limited to, entacapone and tolcapone, and deprenyl. As shown below, concomitant treatment of adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist and COMT or MAO-B inhibitors does not increase side effects.

By “prolonging effective treatment” is meant that the patient's Parkinson's symptoms and motor complications are reduced or inhibited either subjectively or objectively according to the UPDRS, AIMS, PDS, HY and/or MGDRS such that the patient's need for L-DOPA therapy is delayed or removed entirely.

The invention also includes methods of treating movement disorders comprising administering an effective amount of at least one adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist to a patient in need thereof. Such treatment can be therapeutic such as to treat tremors, bradykinesias, gait, dystonias, or tardive dyskinesias or other extrapyramidal syndromes, or preventative such as to prevent or lessen the effects of drugs that cause movement disorders. Such drugs are known in the art and include, but are not limited to, those listed in Table 1.

By “treating movement disorders” is meant the cessation or diminishment of symptoms including, but not limited to, tremor, dystonia, dyskinesia, spasticity. Changes in symptoms can be measured by any method known in the art including, but not limited to, UPDRS, AIMS, PDS, HY and/or MGDRS.

The term “treatment” or “treat” refers to effective inhibition, suppression or cessation of the adenosine activity so as to improve motor dysfunction or delay the onset, retard the progression or ameliorate the symptoms of the disease or disorder.

The present invention thus provides methods of interfering with, blocking or otherwise preventing the interaction or binding of adenosine with an adenosine A_(2A) receptor by employing the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists of the present invention.

Pharmaceutical compositions for administration according to the present invention comprise at least one adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist optionally combined with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. These compositions can be administered by any means that achieve their intended purposes. Amounts and regimens for the administration of a composition according to the present invention can be readily determined by those with ordinary skill in the art in treating Parkinson's disease patients.

The compositions described herein can be administered by any suitable method including, without limitation, orally; intranasally; intrapulmonarally; parenterally, such as subcutaneously, intravenously, intramuscularly, intraperitoneally; intraduodenally; transdermally; or buccally.

The dosage administered is an effective amount and depends upon the age, health and weight of the patient, type of previous or concurrent treatment, if any, frequency of treatment, and the nature of the effect desired. Several factors are typically taken into account when determining an appropriate dosage. These factors include age, sex and weight of the patient, the condition being treated, the severity of the condition and the form of the drug being administered.

An “effective amount” is an amount sufficient to effect a beneficial or desired clinical result. An effective amount can be administered in one or more doses. In terms of treatment, an effective amount is amount that is sufficient to palliate, ameliorate, stabilize, reverse or slow the progression of the disease or disorder, or otherwise reduce the pathological consequences of the disease or disorder. The effective amount is generally determined by the physician on a case-by-case basis and is within the skill of one in the art.

In addition to pharmaceutically active compounds, compositions according to the present invention can also contain suitable pharmaceutically acceptable carriers comprising excipients that facilitate processing of the active compounds into pharmaceutically acceptable preparations. Preferably, the preparations, particularly those preparations which can be administered orally and which can be used for the preferred type of administration, such as tablets, troches and capsules, and also preparations which can be administered rectally, such as suppositories, as well as suitable solutions for administration by injection, contain from about 0.1 to 99 percent, preferably from about 20 to 85 percent of active compound(s), together with the excipient. Liquid pharmaceutically acceptable compositions can, for example, be prepared by dissolving or dispersing a compound embodied herein in a liquid excipient, such as water, saline, aqueous dextrose, glycerol, or ethanol. The composition can also contain other medicinal agents, pharmaceutical agents, carriers, and auxiliary substances such as wetting or emulsifying agents and pH buffering agents.

Pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention are administered by a mode appropriate for the form of composition. Typical routes include subcutaneous, intramuscular, intraperitoneal, intradermal, oral, intranasal, and intrapulmonary (i.e., by aerosol). Pharmaceutical compositions of this invention for human use are typically administered orally.

Pharmaceutical compositions for oral, intranasal, or topical administration can be supplied in solid, semi-solid or liquid forms, including tablets, capsules, powders, liquids, and suspensions. Compositions for injection can be supplied as liquid solutions or suspensions, as emulsions, or as solid forms suitable for dissolution or suspension in liquid prior to injection. For administration via the respiratory tract, a preferred composition is one that provides a solid, powder, or liquid aerosol when used with an appropriate aerosolizer device. Although not required, pharmaceutical compositions are preferably supplied in unit dosage form suitable for administration of a precise amount. Also contemplated by this invention are slow release or sustained release forms, whereby relatively consistent levels of the active compounds are provided over an extended period.

The adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists may preferably be administered in an amount of from about 0.001 to about 20.0 mg per kilogram of body weight. A dosage range of from about 0.01 to about 10 mg per kilogram of body weight is more preferable. Since the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist compositions of this invention will eventually be cleared from the blood stream, regarding administration of the compositions is indicated and preferred.

The adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists can be administered in a manner compatible with the dosage formulation and in such amount as will be therapeutically effective. Systemic dosages depend on the age, weight and conditions of the patient and on the administration route.

Pharmaceutical preparations useful in the methods according to the present invention are manufactured in a known manner. The preparation of pharmaceutical compositions is conducted in accordance with generally accepted procedures for the preparation of pharmaceutical preparations. See, for example, Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences 18th Edition (1990), Martin ed., Mack Publishing Co., PA. Depending on the intended use and mode of administration, it may be desirable to process the active ingredient further in the preparation of pharmaceutical compositions. Appropriate processing may include sterilizing, mixing with appropriate non-toxic and non-interfering components, dividing into dose units and enclosing in a delivery device.

The pharmaceutical preparations for oral use can be obtained by combining the active compounds with solid excipients, optionally grinding the resulting mixture, and processing the mixture of granules, after adding suitable auxiliaries, if desired or necessary, to obtain tablets.

Suitable excipients include, but are not limited to fillers such as saccharides, for example, lactose or sucrose, mannitol or sorbitol; cellulose derivatives; zinc compounds; calcium phosphates such as tricalcium phosphate or calcium hydrogen phosphate; as well as binders such as starch paste, using, for example, maize starch, wheat starch, rice starch, potato starch; gelatin; tragacanth; and/or polyvinylpyrrolidone.

Auxiliaries include flow-regulating agents and lubricants, such as silica, talc, stearic acid or salts thereof, and/or polyethylene glycol. Tablet, caplet or capsule cores are provided with suitable coatings, which, if desired, are resistant to gastric juices. For this purpose, concentrated saccharide solutions can be used, which can optionally contain gum Arabic, talc, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polyethylene glycol and/or titanium dioxide, lacquer solutions and suitable organic solvents or solvent mixtures. In order to produce coatings resistant to gastric juices, i.e., enteric coatings, solutions of suitable cellulose preparations such as acetylcellulose phthalate or hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose phthalate are used. Dyes or pigments can be added to the tablets or coatings, for example, for identification or in order to characterize combinations of active compound doses.

Other pharmaceutical preparations, which can be used orally, include push-fit capsules made of gelatin, as well as soft, sealed capsules made of gelatin and a plasticizer such as glycerol or sorbitol. The push-fit capsules can contain the active compounds in the form of granules, which can be mixed with fillers such as lactose, binders such as starches, and/or lubricants such as talc or magnesium stearate and, optionally, stabilizers. In soft capsules, the active compounds are preferably dissolved or suspended in suitable liquids, such as fatty oils or liquid paraffin. In addition, stabilizers may be added.

Adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists of the present invention can also be administered in the form of an implant when compounded with a biodegradable slow-release carrier. Alternatively, the active ingredients can be formulated as a transdermal patch for continuous release of the active ingredient. Methods of making implants and patches are well known in the art. Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences 18th Edition (1990); and Kydonieus ed. (1992) Treatise on controlled drug delivery, Marcel Dekker, NY.

The following non-limiting Examples, further illustrate the present invention. All references cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference.

Example 1

The safety and efficacy of the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist KW-6002 as a treatment for Parkinson's disease complicated by L-DOPA-related motor complications was examined in a 12-week, multicenter, exploratory study. PD subjects with motor complications were randomly and blindly assigned to 1 of 3 parallel treatment arms: placebo (n=29); KW-6002 up to 20 mg/d (n=26); KW-6002 up to 40 mg/d (n=28). There were 2 primary efficacy measures: 1) change in “off” time as determined by the study investigator during 8-hour clinic visits and 2) change in “off” time as determined by subjects' home motor diaries.

Sixty-five of the 83 enrolled subjects completed the study; withdrawal rates were equally distributed across treatment arms. KW-6002 treatment was significantly more effective than placebo treatment in reducing the proportion of awake time that patients spent in an “off” state. As assessed by home diaries, subjects assigned to KW-6002 experienced a reduction in the proportion of awake time spent in the OFF state of 7.1% compared to an increase of 2.2% in the placebo group (p=0.008). There was a 1.7 hour greater reduction in OFF time in the KW-6002 group than the placebo group (p=0.004). Results for the investigators' on/off 8 hour evaluation approached statistical significance (p=0.054). Patients treated with KW-6002 spent 0.51 fewer hours in the “off” state than did patients in the placebo group (p=0.061).

The study also showed a reduction in early morning dystonia in patients treated with KW-6002 from baseline to Week 12 compared to the placebo group.

Methods

This was a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel group, multicenter, exploratory study of the safety and efficacy of KW-6002 as adjunctive therapy in L-DOPA-treated PD patients with motor complications. Eligible patients were those who met United Kingdom PD Society (UKPDS) brain bank diagnostic criteria (Daniel et al. (1993)), had been on L-DOPA/carbidopa for at least one year, were taking at least four doses of L-DOPA/carbidopa per day, and were experiencing motor complications including end-of-dose wearing off.

After providing informed consent, subjects underwent a screening period of four to eight weeks. Medications were stabilized prior to the week-4 visit. At this visit, the subjects received training regarding completion of home diaries.

At baseline, subjects underwent an 8-hour in-office evaluation. Subjects withheld PD medications and fasted from midnight prior to this evaluation. The first doses of PD medications for the day were administered after the initial assessments, and subsequent doses were administered at subjects' usual interdose intervals. Evaluations were performed by blinded raters who had undergone specific training and who were blinded to adverse events and results of laboratory tests. Subjects were required to exhibit at least 90 minutes of OFF time following PD medication administration during the 8-hour evaluation to be eligible for randomization.

Subjects who successfully completed screening and baseline evaluations were randomized to one of two dose regimens of KW-6002 or matching placebo in a 1:1:1 ratio. Patients randomized to KW-6002 received either 5 mg/day during weeks 1-4, 10 mg/day during weeks 5-8, and 20 mg/day during weeks 9-12 (5/10/20 group) or 10 mg/day during weeks 1-4, 20 mg/day during weeks 5-8, and 40 mg/day during weeks 5-9 (Oct. 20, 1940 group). (FIG. 1). Study medication was taken daily as a single dose with the subjects' normal breakfast.

Subsequent evaluations were undertaken at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks. Subjects completed three daily home diaries during the week before each visit. At each visit, adverse events were assessed. Eight-hour in-office evaluations were completed at weeks 4, 8, and 12. Laboratory blood tests and ECGs were obtained at baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12.

During the course of the study, investigators could decrease the total daily dose of L-DOPA to ameliorate L-DOPA-related adverse events. Changes in the interval between L-DOPA doses were not permitted.

Results

Eighty-three subjects underwent randomization.

No notable differences of demographic and baseline characteristics were found among the study groups.

Subjects in all three treatment groups were 99% compliant with their study medication based on pill counts. During the study, there were no significant changes in mean daily L-DOPA doses in any treatment group or comparing combined KW-6002 and placebo groups.

Subjects randomized to KW-6002 experienced a significant decrease in OFF time compared to subjects randomized to placebo as assessed by home diaries (FIG. 1). Subjects assigned to KW-6002 experienced a reduction in the proportion of awake time spent in the OFF state of 7.1% compared to an increase of 2.2% in the placebo group (p=0.008). Both KW-6002 dose groups exhibited a significant decrease in percent OFF time compared to the placebo group. Similarly, the combined KW-6002 group, as well as each KW-6002 group, experienced a significant reduction in total hours OFF. Subjects assigned to KW-6002 experienced a reduction in OFF time of 1.2 hours compared to an increase of 0.5 hours in the placebo group (p=0.004) (FIG. 1).

Assessment of OFF time by investigators during 8-hour in-office evaluations identified a trend for greater reduction in OFF time in the combined KW-6002 group compared to the placebo group. Subjects assigned to KW-6002 exhibited a 10.0% decrease in OFF time compared to a decrease of 3.3% in the placebo group (p=0.05). Similarly, subjects assigned to KW-6002 exhibited a decrease in OFF time of 0.8 hours compared to a decrease of 0.3 hours in the placebo group (p=0.06). Off time reduction at the higher dose KW-6002 group was significant (P=0.02).

Early morning dystonia in patients treated with KW-6002 was reduced from baseline to Week 12 compared to the placebo group.

The overall adverse event profile was of no difference in subjects treated with KW-6002 versus placebo. The overall occurrence of serious adverse events was similarly distributed across the study groups. The number of total withdrawals and withdrawals due to adverse events were similar in the KW-6002 and placebo groups. No notable changes or differences between KW-6002 and placebo groups were observed in systolic or diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, body weight, ECG, and mean values urinalysis or blood chemistry analyses remained within laboratory reference range.

In this study, under a variety of concomitant medication with dopamine agonists (e.g., Pramipexol, Pergolide, Ropinirol, Bromocriptine), COMT inhibitors (e.g., Entacapone, Tolcapone) and a MAO inhibitor selegiline, KW-6002 showed significant OFF time reduction, and safety and good tolerability.

Based on the findings of this study, the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist KW-6002 can safely and effectively reduce off time in Parkinson's disease patients with L-DOPA motor complications.

The present study also shows that the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist KW-6002 showed significant OFF time reduction in Parkinson's disease patients treated with the concomitant medication of L-DOPA and a dopamine agonist and/or a COMT inhibitor and/or a MAO inhibitor.

The present study also shows that KW-6002 reduces early morning dystonia in Parkinson's disease patients.

Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity and understanding, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that certain changes and modifications may be practiced. Therefore, the description and examples should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention.

Example 2

Sixteen individuals with moderate to advanced Parkinson's disease consented to participate in this double-blind, placebo-controlled study. All were randomized to either KW-6002, or matching placebo capsules. The study employed a rising dose design (40 and 80 mg/day) lasting 6 weeks. Parkinsonism was rated on the UPDRS part III Motor Examination. All evaluations were videotaped for subsequent off-line scoring by a second, blinded rater.

KW-6002 alone or in combination with a steady-state intravenous infusion of each patient's optimal L-DOPA dose had no effect on Parkinsonian severity. At a threshold dose of infused L-DOPA, KW-6002 potentiated the antiparkinsonian response by 38% (p<0.05). No medically significant drug toxicity was observed.

KW-6002 in combination with a threshold dose of L-DOPA improved motor condition (rated using the UPDRS III Motor Examination scale) items as much as the optimal L-DOPA dose alone.

Thus, the present invention provides methods and compositions for treating Parkinson's disease patients with a sub-clinically effecteve dose of L-DOPA by combining L-DOPA treatment with an effective amount of one or more adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists (i.e., L-DOPA sparing effect).

The study showed that mean scores for tremor at rest and rise from chair demonstrated substantial improvement at Weeks 4 and 6 with respect to baseline and the placebo group. Mean scores for gait and body bradykinesia were observed to appreciably improve in KW-6002-treated patients at Week 6, relative to baseline and the placebo treated group. This means that KW-6002 also effectively treats tremor and gait of both Parkinson's disease patients and patients having other movement disorders.

Thus, the present invention provides methods for the effective treatment of movement disorders with tremor, bradykinesias, gait and bradykinesia.

The findings derived from Examples 1 and 2 confirm that adenosine A_(2A) receptor mechanisms play a role in symptom production in Parkinson's disease and motor complications, and that drugs able to block the receptors selectively confer therapeutic benefit to L-DOPA treated patients with this disorder.

That is, the present invention provides methods of treating movement disorders by administering an effective amount of one or more adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists to a patient in need thereof, as well as methods of reducing or suppressing the adverse effectiveness of L-DOPA in patients receiving L-DOPA therapy in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Example 3

GABA and glutamate concentrations in an output nucleus of basal ganglia, substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr), are measured in the 6-hydroxydopamine lesion rats and the chronically L-DOPA-treated rats after 6-hydroxydopamine lesion. Effect of adenosine A_(2A) receptor selective antagonists on GABA and glutamate levels in SNr and dyskinesias was examined.

Methods:

6-hydroxydopamine (8 μg) was injected into the left medial forebrain bundle in a rat. One week after the lesion, the rats were then tested for contralateral turning by injecting apomorphine (0.1 mg/kg s.c.). Only those animals showing robust contralateral turning were used in subsequent experiments. Three days after the apomorphine tests, L-DOPA was administrated orally twice a day at a dose of 20 mg/kg for 1 to 3 weeks.

For qualification of L-DOPA induced dyskinesia, rats were observed individually to score severity scale of abnormal involuntary moments (AIM) including locomotive, axial, limb and orolingual AIMs, which assigns a score from 0 to 4 to each of the four AIM subtypes according to the proportion of time/monitoring period during which the AIM is present. During the chronic treatment of L-DOPA, recording of severity scale of AIMs were carried out. In addition, an amplitude-based scale for each limb and axial AIMs was scored during a microdialysis study. Amplitude scores of limb or axial AIMs (each ranging from 0 to 4) was rated based on both the magnitude of paw/limb translocation and of the visible involvement of distal versus proximal muscle groups or on the lateral deviation (or torsion) of an animal's neck and trunk from the longitudinal axis of its body, respectively.

GABA and glutamate in SNr were measured after 6-hydroxydopamine lesion and four days after terminating the repeated L-DOPA treatments, with in vivo microdialysis technique. Rats were placed in each test chamber and the microdialysis probe inserted into SNr was attached to a fluid swivel (TCS2-23, Eicom) that allowed free movement (also sustained rotational behavior). Probes were continuously perfused with a modified Ringer's solution (1.2 mmol/L CaCl₂, 2.7 mmol/L KCl, 148 mmol/L NaCl, and 0.85 mmol/L MgCl₂; pH 7, artificial cerebrospinal fluid solution) at a rate of 2 μL/min via a microinjection pump (CMA/100, Carnegie Medicin AB). After stabilization of basal level of release for 3-4 h, 4 samples (60 μL each) during 2 h of perfusion were collected using a fraction collector (CMA/140, Carnegie Medicin). Sixty μL of perfusate per sample (during 30 min) was divided into 2×30 μL in sampling tubes (sample vial for Auto-sampling-injector 231XL, Eicom), and the concentrations of GABA and glutamate were determined from each sample. The samples were immediately assayed or frozen and stored in a deep freeze (−80° C.) before assays. GABA and glutamate were analyzed using reverse phase high-performance liquid chromatograph with fluorescence detection after pre-column derivatization of the amino acids with orthophthaldialdehyde reagent. Lindroth and Mopper (1979).

Results:

KW-6002 (1 mg/kg p.o.) caused a marked and sustained increase of GABA and glutamate levels in the SNr of the 6-hydroxydopamine lesioned rats (FIGS. 2A, 2B). L-DOPA also induced the facilitation of nigral GABA and glutamate in 6-hydroxydopamine lesioned rats (FIGS. 3A, 3B)

AIMs with 1 week daily repeated treatments of L-DOPA were still varied in individual rat and maintained the maximum severity grades for a short time. With 2 to 3 weeks in chronic L-DOPA treatments, animals produced stable AIMs, and maintained average maximum AIM scores (9) from 10 min to 3 hrs after L-DOPA administration.

The basal nigral glutamate concentration maintained constant levels until 2 week chronic treatment of L-DOPA, and drastically increase in 3 weeks, whereas nigral GABA levels maintained unchanged throughout the periods, as shown in Table 3. Table 3 shows the basal level of nigral GABA and glutamate in chronic L-DOPA-treated rats after 6-hydroxydopamine lesion.

TABLE 3 Duration of L-DOPA treatment 0 1 week 2 weeks 3 weeks GABA, nmol/L 19.8 ± 2.5 19.3 ± 2.3 20.9 ± 6.8 23.6 ± 4.5 (N) (11) (3) (3) (13) Glutamate, 185.0 ± 36.5 147.5 ± 38.1 112.0 ± 47.1 425.4 ± 99.6 nmol/L (N) (12) (3) (3) (13)

L-DOPA elicited marked AIMs (sum of the amplitude score of limb and axial AIMs), whereas KW-6002 induced little or no AIMs in the chronically treated rats (FIG. 4).

L-DOPA increased glutamate levels without effect on nigral GABA levels, whereas KW-6002 gave no or little effects on nigral GABA and glutamate levels (FIG. 5).

The time courses of increase of L-DOPA induced AIMs amplitude were parallel with the increase of L-DOPA induced nigral glutamate levels (FIGS. 4 and 5B).

Example 4

To compare in MPTP monkeys rendered parkinsonian by repeated injections of MPTP and having never received L-DOPA or dopaminergic agents the effect of chronic treatment with L-DOPA alone or in combination with KW-6002 or placebo.

ANIMALS: 8 (eight) female drug-naïve cynomologus monkeys weighing between 3 and 5 kg were used. They were rendered parkinsonian by subcutaneous infusion of MPTP (0.5 mg daily) until development of an obvious parkinsonian Syndrome (akinesia, hunched posture and tremor associated with a disability score on our scale of 6 or more). The cumulative dose necessary was variable: from 3.5 to 23.5 mg.

The animals were allowed to recover during at least one month except an animal who had to be treated earlier because of marked akinesia. They were scored at least once daily. The disability score remained stable throughout that period.

TREATMENT: All animals were treated with L-DOPA/benserazide 100/25 mg (total dose) once daily. The drug was administered orally with a special capsule handler. The animals in the KW-6002 group also received this compound (90 mg/kg) by the oral route. The animals were observed daily (from Monday to Friday) in their cages through a one-way screen and video recordings were made of significant events (abnormal behavior—dyskinesias). They were scored on disability scale and eventually dyskinesia rating scale, before and during the effect. The treatment with L-DOPA was continued for one month.

Results

The antiparkinsonian response to L-DOPA in terms of improvement of the parkinsonian score over four weeks was stable and comparable in the L-DOPA alone group and in the combination (L-DOPA+KW-6002) treatment group. (FIG. 6).

The locomotor activity counts increased to a higher level in the combination treatment group and its level was maintained over four weeks. (FIG. 7).

Dyskinesias increased more rapidly and reached a higher level in the L-DOPA group than in the combination treatment group. Thus, the onset of dyskinesia was delayed in the presence of KW-6002. Even after appearance of dyskinesia (week 3 and 4), the KW-6002 treatment group produced less dyskinesia than L-DOPA alone group. (FIG. 8).

At the end of the one-month treatment period, all drugs were stopped. The following day, the animals of the KW-6002 group were challenged with a standard dose of L-DOPA/benserazide(100/25 mg), administered orally. The three animals that had already displayed dyskinesias had a similar response to the combination.

In conclusion, the addition of KW-6002 to L-DOPA in the treatment of previously drug-naïve parkinsonian monkeys during one month delay the onset of dyskinesia and produced less dyskinesia, while it produced stronger locomotor response, and a similar improvement of the parkinsonian score.

Example 5

Effect of KW-6002 on L-DOPA induced dyskinesia in MPTP treated common marmosets that had previously been primed to exhibit dyskinesia L-DOPA was investigated.

METHODS: MPTP (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo., USA) was dissolved in physiological saline and administered at a dose of 2.0 mg/kg s.c daily for 5 days. Then, MPTP 2 mg/kg were further administered approximately 3 weeks. 8 weeks after exposure to MPTP, animals showed chronic parkinsonian symptoms such as marked reduction of basal locomotor activity, slower and less coordinated movements, abnormal postures of some parts of the body, and reduced checking movement and eye blinks. The animals, which showed sufficient chronic parkinsonian symptoms, were selected for this study.

L-DOPA (10 mg/kg p.o.) plus benserazide (2.5 mg/kg p.o.) was then administered twice daily for 28 days to the MPTP-treated marmosets to induce dyskinesia. The dyskinesia of the animals was scored using the rating scale described in Table 4. The animals, which showed high dyskinesia score up to 8 by each L-DOPA administration, were used in this study. Dyskinesias induced by L-DOPA (10 mg/kg p.o. plus benserazide 2.5 mg/kg p.o.) were scored in MPTP-treated marmosets. The score was calculated as the L-DOPA pre value. On the next day the animals received vehicle for the vehicle control value. One day later, they were administered with L-DOPA (2.5 mg/kg, p.o.) to obtain the L-DOPA control value. Then the effects of KW-6002 on L-DOPA induced dyskinesia were observed. Administration of KW-6002 (10 mg/kg p.o.) combined with L-DOPA (2.5 mg/kg, p.o.) was started on the following day (day 1) and repeated once daily for 21 days, followed by a one-week washout period. Animals were assessed for dyskinesia on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, 21 and 28 according to the rating scale. In addition, the L-DOPA post value was obtained by administration of L-DOPA (10 mg/kg p.o.) to the marmosets on day 35.

Table 4 shows the results of quantifying the presence of limb dystonia, chorea and choreathetoid dyskinesia and stereotypies. Abnormal movement such as, orofacial movements, myoclonus and complex stereotypic behaviors (e.g., elaborate checking, obsessive grooming), are exclude from dyskinesia rating.

TABLE 4 Score 0 Absent 1 Mild Fleeting and rare dyskinetic postures and movements. 2 Moderate More prominent abnormal movements, but not interfering significantly with normal behavior. 3 Marked Frequent and at times continuous dyskinesias intruding upon normal repertory of activity. 4 Severe Virtually continuous dyskinetic activity, disabling to animal and replacing normal behavior. Remarks according to dyskinesia. Dystonia (arm, leg and trunk): abnormal sustained posture (ex. leg elevation). Stereotypic reaching (arm) Athetosis (arm and leg): writhing twisting movements. Chorea (arm and leg): abnormal rapid (dance like) movements of limbs. Akathisia: motor restlessness. Dyskinesia score is become higher according to severity of dyskinesia. The maximal score is four points.

RESULTS: Results was represented on FIG. 9. Oral administration of L-DOPA (2.5 mg/kg) induced mild dyskinesias in MPTP-treated common marmosets that had previously been primed to exhibit dyskinesia by L-DOPA. The L-DOPA (2.5 mg/kg p.o.) induced dyskinesia was not changed or trended to reduced by KW-6002 (10 mg/kg p.o.) for 21 days compared with L-DOPA alone control. On the day 21, KW-6002 shows significant reduction of L-DOPA induced dyskinesias compared with 2.5 mg/kg of L-DOPA alone. The significant reduction caused by KW-6002 in L-DOPA induced dyskinesia was observed by acute administration of KW-6002 (10 mg/kg) with L-DOPA (2.5 mg/kg) in 1 week after the repeated administration for 21 days of KW-6002 and L-DOPA.

In conclusion, results of these experiments indicate that KW-6002 suppresses L-DOPA induced dyskinesias.

Preparation Example 1 Tablets

Tablets having the following composition are prepared in a conventional manner.

KW-6002 (40 g) is mixed with 286.8 g of lactose and 60 g of potato starch, followed by addition of 120 g of a 10% aqueous solution of hydroxypropyl cellulose. The resultant mixture is kneaded, granulated, and then dried by a conventional method. The granules are refined to give granules used to make tablets. After mixing the granules with 1.2 g of magnesium stearate, the mixture is formed into tablets each containing 20 mg of the active ingredient by using a tablet maker (Model RT-15, Kikusui) having pestles of 8 mm diameter.

The prescription is shown in Table 5.

TABLE 5 Compound (I) 20 mg Lactose 143.4 mg Potato Starch 30 mg Hydroxypropyl Cellulose 6 mg Magnesium Stearate 0.6 mg 200 mg

Preparation Example 2 Capsules

Capsules having the following composition are prepared in a conventional manner.

KW-6002 (200 g) is mixed with 995 g of Avicel and 5 g of magnesium stearate. The mixture is put in hard capsules No. 4 each having a capacity of 120 mg by using a capsule filler (Model LZ-64, Zanashi) to give capsules each containing 20 mg of the active ingredient.

The prescription is shown in Table 6.

TABLE 6 Compound (I)  20 mg Avicel 99.5 mg  Magnesium Stearate  0.5 mg 120 mg

Preparation Example 3 Injections

Injections having the following composition are prepared in a conventional manner.

KW-6002 (1 g) is dissolved in 100 g of purified soybean oil, followed by addition of 12 g of purified egg yolk lecithin and 25 g of glycerin for injection. The resultant mixture is made up to 1,000 ml with distilled water for injection, thoroughly mixed, and emulsified by a conventional method. The resultant dispersion is subjected to aseptic filtration by using 0.2 μm disposable membrane filters, and then aseptically put into glass vials in 2 ml portions to give injections containing 2 mg of the active ingredient per vial.

The prescription is shown in Table 7.

TABLE 7 Compound (I) 2 mg Purified Soybean Oil 200 mg Purified Egg Yolk Lecithin 24 mg Glycerine for Injection 50 mg Distilled Water for Injection 1.72 ml 2.00 ml

Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity and understanding, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that certain changes and modifications may be practiced. Therefore, the description and examples should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention.

REFERENCE LIST

-   U.S. Pat. No. 5,484,920 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,543,415 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,565,460 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,587,378 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,703,085 -   WO 92/06976 -   WO 94/01114 -   WO 98/42711 -   WO 99/35147 -   WO 99/43678 -   WO 00/13681 -   WO 00/13682 -   WO 00/17201 -   WO 00/69464 -   WO 01/02400 -   WO 01/02409 -   WO 01/17999 -   WO 01/40230 -   WO 01/62233 -   WO 01/80893 -   WO 01/92264 -   WO 01/97786 -   WO 02/14282 -   EP 1054012 -   Adler et al. (1993a) “Vitamin E treatment of tardive dyskinesia”     Am. J. Psych. 150:1405-1407 -   Adler et al. (1993b) “Vitamin E in tardive dyskinesia: time course     of effect after placebo substitution” Psychopharmacol. Bull.     29:371-374 -   Adler et al. (1999) “Vitamin E treatment for tardive dyskinesia”     Arch. Gen. Psych. 56:836-841 -   Akhtar et al. (1993) “Vitamin E in the treatment of tardive     dyskinesia” J. Neural. Transm. Gen. Sect. 92:197-201 -   Alexander et al. (1990) “Functional architecture of basal ganglia     circuits: neuronal substrates of processing” Trends Neurosci.     13:266-271 -   American College of Neuropsychopharmacology-FDA Task Force (1973)     “Neurologic syndromes associated with neuroleptic drug use” N.     Engl. J. Med. 289:20-23 -   Aoyama et al. (2000) “Rescue of locomotor impairment in dopamine D₂     receptor-deficient mice by an adenosine A_(2A) receptor     antagonist” J. Neurosci. 20:5848-5852 -   Aoyama et al. (2002) “Distribution of adenosine A_(2A) receptor     antagonist KW-6002 and its effect on gene expression in the rat     brain” Brain Res. 953:119-25 -   Baik et al. (1995) “Parkinsonian-like locomotor impairment in mice     lacking dopamine D₂ receptors” Nature 377:424-428 -   Baldessarini and Tarsy (1978) “Tardive dyskinesia” In:     Psychopharmacology: a generation of progress. Lipton et al. eds. NY     Raven Press pp. 995-1004 -   Baldessarini (1990) “Drugs and the treatment of psychiatric     disorders” Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of     Therapeutics, Gilman et al. (eds). New York, Pergamon Press, 8th Ed     pp. 383-435 -   Bartholini (1983) “GABA system, GABA receptor agonist and     dyskinesia” In: Modern problems in pharmacopsychiatry. Ban et al.     eds. New York: Karger 21:143-154 -   Bezard et al. (2001) “Pathophysiology of levodopa-induced     dyskinesia: Potential for new therapies” Nature Neurosci. Rev.     577-588 -   Bischot et al. (1993) “Vitamin E in extrapyramidal disorders” J.     Postgrad. Med. 39:124-126 -   Blurn and Korczyn (1983) “Peptide neurotransmitters and their     implications for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia” In: Modern     problems in pharmacopsychiatry. Ban et al. eds. New York:Karger     21:187-95 -   Burns et al. (1986) “Characterization of the A₂ adenosine receptor     labeled by [³H]NECA in rat striatal membranes” Mol. Pharmacol.     29:331-346 -   Casey (1999) “Tardive dyskinesia and atypical antipsychotic drugs”     Schizophrenia Res. 35:561-566 -   Chen et al. (2001a) J. Neurosci. 21:RC143(1-6) -   Chen et al. (2001b) “The role of the D₂ dopamine receptor (D₂R) in     A_(2A) adenosine receptor (A_(2A)R)-mediated behavioral and cellular     responses as revealed by A_(2A) and D₂ receptor knockout mice” Proc.     Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:1970-1975 -   Clayeria et al. (1975) “Tardive dyskinesia treated with pimozide” J.     Neurol. Sci.; 24:393-401 -   Crossman (1990) “A hypothesis on the pathophysiological mechanisms     that underlie levodopa or dopamine-agonist-induced dyskinesia in     Parkinson's disease: implications for future strategies in     treatment” Mov. Disord. 5:100-108 -   Dabiri et al. (1993) “Effectiveness of vitamin E for treatment of     long-term tardive dyskinesia” Am. J. Psych. 150:1405-1407 -   Dabiri et al. (1994) “Effectiveness of vitamin E for treatment of     long-term tardive dyskinesia” Am. J. Psych. 151:925-926 -   Daly et al. (1983) “Subclasses of adenosine receptors in the central     nervous system: interaction with caffeine and related     methylxanthines” Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 3:69-80 -   Daniel et al. (1993) “Parkinson's disease society brain bank,     London: overview and research” J. Neural Transm. 39(suppl):165-172 -   DeLong (1990) “Primate model of movement disorders of basal ganglia     origin” Trends Neurosci. 13:281-285 -   Dixon et al. (1996) “Tissue distribution of adenosine A_(2A)     receptor mRNAs in the rat” Bri. J. Pharmacol. 118:1461-1468 -   Driesens (1988) “Neuroleptic medication facilitates the natural     occurrence of tardive dyskinesia. A critical review”     Acta-Psychiatr.-Belg. 88:195-205 -   Duvoisin (1974) “Variations in the ‘on-off phenomenon” Neurology     24:431-441 -   Egan et al. (1992) “Treatment of tardive dyskinesia with vitamin E”     Am. J. Psych. 149:773-777 -   Egan et al. (1997) “Treatment of tardive dyskinesia” Schiz. Bull.     23:583-609 -   Elkashef et al. (1990) “Vitamin E in the treatment of tardive     dyskinesia” Am. J. Psych. 147:505-506 -   Fredholm et al. (1994) “Action of caffeine in the brain with special     reference to Dependence” Pharmacol. Rev. 46:143-156 -   Gardos et al. (1994) “Ten-Year outcome of tardive dyskinesia” Am. J.     Psych. 151:836-841 -   Gelenberg et al. (1990) “A crossover study of lecithin treatment of     tardive dyskinesia” J. Clin. Psych. 51:149-153 -   Gerfen et al. (1990) “D₁ and D₂ dopamine receptor-regulated gene     expression of striatonigral and striatopallidal neurons” Science     250:1429-1432 -   Gerfen (1992) “The neostriatal mosaic: multiple levels of     compartmental organization in the basal ganglia” Ann. Rev. Neurosci.     15:285-320 -   Goldberg (1996) “The Use of Vitamin E to Treat People with Tardive     Dyskinesia” J. Clin. Psych. 57:167-173 -   Graybiel (1990) “Neurotransmitters and neuromodulators in the basal     ganglia” Trends Neurosci. 13:244-254 -   Grondin et al. (1999) “Antiparkinsonian effect of a new selective     adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist in MPTP-treated monkeys”     Neurology 52:1673-1677 -   Huang et al. (1981) “Reserpine and α-methyldopa in the treatment of     tardive dyskinesia” Psychopharmacology 73:359-362 -   Ikeda et al. (2002) “Neuroprotection by adenosine A_(2A) receptor     blockade in experimental models of Parkinson's disease” J.     Neurochem. 80:262-270 -   Itoh et al. (1981) “Drug-induced tardive dyskinesia” In: Current     developments in psychopharmacology. Essman, Valzelli, eds. Jamaica,     N.Y.: Spectrum 93-126 -   Jarvis et al. (1989) “Direct autographic localization of adenosine     A₂ receptors in rat brain using the A₂ selective agonist     [³H]CGS21680” Eur. J. Pharmacol. 168:243-246 -   Kanda et al. (1998a) “Adenosine A₂, antagonist: a novel     antiparkinsonian agent that does not provoke dyskinesia in     parkinsonian monkeys” Ann. Neurol. 43:507-513 -   Kanda et al. (2000) “Combined use of the adenosine A_(2A) antagonist     KW-6002 with L-DOPA or with selective D₁ or D₂ dopamine agonists     increases antiparkinsonian activity but not dyskinesia in     MPTP-treated monkeys” Exp. Neurol. 162:321-327

Karp et al. (1981) “Metoclopramide treatment of tardive dyskinesia” JAMA 246:1934-1935

-   Kase (2001) “New aspects of physiological and pathophysiological     functions of adenosine A_(2A) receptor in basal ganglia” Biosci.     Biotechnol. Biochem. 65:1447-1457 -   Klawans et al. (1980) “Tardive dyskinesia: Review and update” Am. J.     Psych. 137:900-908 -   Kurokawa et al. (1996) J. Neurochem. 66:1882-1888 -   Lindroth and Mopper (1979) “High performance liquid chromatography     determination of subpicomole amounts of amino acids by precolumn     fluorescence derivatization with o-phthaldialdehyde” Analyt. Chem.     51:1667-1674 -   Lohr and Caligiuri (1996) “A double-blind placebo-controlled study     of vitamin E treatment of tardive dyskinesia” J. Clin. Psych.     57:167-73 -   Lohr et al. (1988) “Vitamin E in the treatment of tardive     dyskinesia: the possible involvement of free radical mechanisms”     Schiz. Bull. 14:291-296 -   Marsden et al. (1982) “Fluctuations in disability in Parkinson's     disease: clinical aspects” In: Mardsen, C D, Fahn S., eds. Movement     disorders. New York: Butterworth Scientific pp. 96-122 -   McCreadie et al. (1994) “The Nithsdale Schizophrenia Surveys. XIV:     Plasma lipid peroxide and serum vitamin E levels in patients with     and without tardive dyskinesia, and in normal subjects” Am. J.     Psych. 151:925-926 -   Moore and Bowers (1980) “Identification of a subgroup of tardive     dyskinesia patients by pharmacologic probes” Am. J. Psych.     137:1202-1205 -   Mori et al. (1996) “The role of adenosine A_(2A) receptors in     regulating GABAergic synaptic transmission in striatal medium spiny     neurons” J. Neurosci. 16:605-611 -   Moss et al. (1993) “Buspirone in the treatment of tardive     dyskinesia” J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 13:204-209 -   Obeso et al. (1997) “Basal ganglia physiology—A critical review”     Advances in Neurology (Obeso et al. eds) 74:3-7 Lippincott Raven     Publishers, Philadelphia -   Obeso et al. (2000) “Pathophysiology of the basal ganglia in     Parkinson's disease” Trends Neurosci. 23(Suppl):S8-S19 -   Ochi et al. (2000) “Systemic adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist     decreases GABA release from rat globus pallidus increased by     nigrostriatal lesions: A microdialysis study” Neuroscience 100:53-62 -   Olanow, Watts and Koller eds. (2001) An Algorithm (Decision Tree)     for the Management of Parkinson's Disease (2001): Treatment     Guidelines, Neurology 56, Suppl. 5. -   Parkinson Study Group (1996) “Impact of deprenyl and tocopherol     treatment on Parkinson's disease in DATATOP patients requiring     levodopa” Ann. Neurol. 39:37-45 -   Parkinson Study Group (2000) “Pramipexole vs. levodopa as initial     treatment for Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled trial”     JAMA 284:1931-1938 -   Rascol et al. (2000) “A five-year study of the incidence of     dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were     treated with ropinirole or levodopa” N. Eng. J. Med. 342:1484-1491 -   Richardson et al. (1997) “Adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists as     new agents for the treatment of Parkinson's disease” Trends     Pharmacol. Sci. 18:338-344 -   Schiffmann et al. (1991a) “Striatal restricted A₂ receptor (RDC8) is     expressed by enkephalin but not by substance P neurons: an in situ     hybridization histochemistry study” J. Neurochem. 57:1062-1067 -   Schiffmann et al. (1991b) “Distribution of adenosine A₂ receptor     mRNA in the human brain” Neurosci. Lett. 130:177-181 -   Shindou et al. (2001) “Adenosine A_(2A) receptor enhances     GABA_(A)-mediated IPSCs in the rat globus pallidus” J. Physiol.     532:423-434 -   Shriqui et al. (1992) “Vitamin E in the treatment of tardive     dyskinesia: a double-blind placebo-controlled study” Am. J. Psych.     149:391-143 -   Shulman and Weiner (1997) Multiple system atrophy. In: Watts and     Koller eds. Movement Disorders: Neurological Principles and     Practice. New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill pp. 297-306 -   Tepper and Haas (1979) “Prevalence of tardive dyskinesia” J. Clin.     Psych. 40:508-516 -   Thaker et al. (1990) “Clonazepam treatment of tardive dyskinesia: a     practical GABAmimetic strategy” Am. J. Psych. 147:445-451 -   Uhrbrand and Faurbye (1960) “Reversible and irreversible dyskinesia     after treatment with perphenazine, chlorpromazine, reserpine, ECT     therapy” Psychopharmacologia 1:408-418 -   Watts and William eds. (1997) Movement Disorders: Neurologic     Principles and Practice. New York: McGraw-Hill -   Wilbur and Kulik (1980) “Propranolol for tardive dyskinesia and EPS     from neuroleptics: Possible involvement of β-adrenergic mechanisms”     Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. 4:627-632 

1. A method of reducing or suppressing the adverse effectiveness of L-DOPA and/or dopamine agonist therapy, comprising administering an effective amount of at least one adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist to a Parkinson's disease patient.
 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the patient suffers from L-DOPA- or other dopaminergic-agent-induced motor complications.
 3. The method according to claim 2, wherein OFF time in motor fluctuations is reduced.
 4. The method according to claim 2, wherein dyskinesias in motor complications are improved. 5-9. (canceled)
 10. A method for L-DOPA sparing treatment, comprising administering to a patient in need thereof a combination of a sub-clinically effective amount of L-DOPA and one or more adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists in an amount effective to render the L-DOPA efficacious. 11-15. (canceled)
 16. A composition for L-DOPA sparing treatment, comprising a sub-clinically effective amount of L-DOPA and one or more adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonists in an amount of effective to render the L-DOPA efficacious. 17-21. (canceled)
 22. A method of treating Parkinson's disease and/or L-DOPA motor complications, comprising administering an effective amount of at least one adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist in combination with a COMT inhibitor and/or DA and/or MAO inhibitor to a patient in need thereof. 23-27. (canceled)
 28. A composition for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, comprising an effective amount of at least one adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist, and a COMT inhibitor and/or DA and/or MAO inhibitor. 29-33. (canceled)
 34. A method of prolonging effective treatment of Parkinson's disease, comprising administering to a patient in need thereof either an adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist or a combination of an adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist and a dopamine agonist in an amount effective to delay or remove the patient's need for add-on L-DOPA therapy. 35-42. (canceled)
 43. A method of treating movement; disorders, comprising administrating an effective amount of at least one adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist to a patient in need thereof.
 44. The method according to claim 43, wherein the patient suffers from tremors, bradykinesias, shuffling gait, dystonias, dyskinesias, tardive dyskinesias or other extrapyramidal syndromes. 45-49. (canceled)
 50. The method according to claim 43, wherein the adenosine A_(2A) receptor antagonist is (E)-8-(3,4-dimethoxystyryl)-1,3-diethyl-7-methylxanthine. 